Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J
Eswaran – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction for possession of ganja based on police evidence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellant's arguments against procedural compliance and evidence credibility. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's acceptance of procedural compliance under section 42. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. final dismissal of the appeal confirming the sentence. (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
The appellant/A2 in C.C.No.296 of 2021 on the file of I Additional Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai, has filed this appeal, challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed against him on 21.04.2023, whereby, he was convicted for the offence under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) and 25 of the NDPS Act for the alleged illegal possession and transportation of 102 kg of ganja
2.1. The brief facts of the case is as follows:
When P.W.2 was working as Sub-Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, MAdurai, on 30.12.2020, at 06.45 pm, he received a secret information through telephone from his informant about the illegal transportation of ganja in the Toyota Car bearing Reg.No.TN-09-CS-5062 near Katthapatti Melur Taluk, Madurai District. He recorded the said information in the General Diary and reduced it in writting under Ex.P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
