IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 13.08.2025 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

1.Lakshmi @ Kuppulakshmi

2.K.Balachandraguptha

3.B.Deepika ...Appellants Vs.

1.B.Hariprakash

2.United India Insurance Company Limited, No.2, Bhuvaneswari Complex, DR.Sankaran Road, Namakkal District. ...Respondents Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the order dated 01.04.2022 made in M.C.O.P.No.1321 of 2019 on the file of the MCOP Tribunal, Special District Court, Salem.

For Appellants : Mr.S.P.Yuvaraj For Respondents : R1 – exparte Mr.D.Venkatachalam for R2

J U D G M E N T

This appeal is filed by the appellants challenging the order dated

01.04.2022 made in M.C.O.P.No.1321 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Special District Court, Salem.

2.For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Tribunal.

3.The petitioners are the claimants, first respondent is the owner of the vehicle and second respondent is the Insurance Company before the Tribunal.

4.The brief facts of the case are as follows:

On 14.06.2017 at about 7.15 p.m., when Mohan @

Mohanakrishnan was travelling as a pillion rider in the two wheeler bearing Registration No.TN 28 AM 0135 from Puthan Sandai towards Namakkal Road, the rider of the two wheeler drew the same in a rash and negligent manner near Sellappampatty over bridge at that time, unknown lorry coming behind and hit against the lorry due to which the said Mohan @ Mohanakrishnan sustained grievous injuries and died in Government Hospital, Namakkal. The petitioners filed a claim petition before the Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.1321 of 2019, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.11,65,000/- as compensation. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal has been filed.

5.Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that due to the accident, the appellant died and the Tribunal fixed the notional income of the deceased at Rs.10,000/- is not sufficient as the deceased aged 22 years and was engineering student at the time of the accident. Further, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is also very meagre and hence, he filed the present appeal for enhancement.

6.Learned counsel appearing for the second respondent submitted that the Tribunal after considering the oral and documentary evidence has awarded the compensation which is just and reasonable and no interference is required by this Court. Hence, he prayed for dismissal of the appeal.

7.Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants, learned counsel for the second respondent and perused the materials available on record.

8.Before the Tribunal, the first petitioner was examined as PW1, Mr.Saravanan was examined as PW2 and on the side of the petitioners, 10 documents were marked as Exs.P1 to P10. On the side of the respondents, Mr.Natarajan was examined as RW1 and 2 documents were examined as Exs.X1 and X2.

9.The Tribunal after elaborately discussing the factual aspects awarded a sum of Rs.10,80,000/- for loss of income, Rs.60,000/- for loss of love and affection, Rs.25,000/- for funeral expenses and arrived at a total compensation of Rs.11,65,000/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a.

from the date of petition till the date of realization.

10.On perusal of records, it is seen that the petitioner was aged 22 years and was an Engineering student at the time of the accident.

11.The amount awarded under the heads loss of income and loss of love & affection, in the opinion of this Court is very meagre and this Court is inclined to enhance the amount awarded under the said heads. Accordingly, the amount awarded under the head loss of income is enhanced to Rs.24,19,200/- from Rs.10,80,000/-. Accordingly, the amount awarded under the head loss of love and affection is enhanced to Rs.1,20,000/- from Rs.60,000/-. The amount awarded under the head funeral expenses, in the opinion of this Court, is very excessive and this Court is inclined to reduce the am