Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MRS. R. KALAIMATHI, J
M.Venkatachalam – Appellant
Versus
A.Bakthavachalam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and fraud claims regarding sale deed execution (Para 3 , 18 , 19) |
| 2. burden of proof under section 111 with respect to fraud (Para 10 , 12 , 21) |
| 3. outcome of claims affected by limitation and support from earlier document executions (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
The sole plaintiff in O.S.No.89 of 2011 before the Sub Court, Mettur, who lost his case before the trial Court as well as the First Appellate Court – I-Additional District Court, Salem (A.S.No.29 of 2017) has preferred this Second Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 10.12.2018 passed in A.S.No.29 of 2017.
2. Parties are indicated herein as per their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.
3. According to the plaintiff, he is the absolute owner of the suit property by virtue of partition deed dated 16.06.1999 registered in Document No.1941 of 1999 of Sub Registrar Office, Omalur. He is an illiterate person. In the year 2001, he was in need of money and one Selvam and Nagaraj introduced the 1st defendant who is doing money lending business. He borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- on 06.09.2001 and executed promissory note, signed in blank stamp papers and cheques in favour of the 1st d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
