Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
Ranganathan – Appellant
Versus
Pachaiyappa Nattar (Deceased) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendants dispute plaintiff's claims. (Para 4) |
| 3. issues framed for trial. (Para 6) |
| 4. appellant's grounds for appeal. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. district judge's points for determination. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. discussion on wrongful dismissal. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. arguments relating to marriage validity. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 8. judicial notice of relevant facts. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 9. judgment on will and partition rights. (Para 34 , 35) |
| 10. judgment on amendments and property rights. (Para 36 , 37) |
| 11. findings on property entitlement. (Para 38 , 39) |
| 12. final decree for partition granted. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal had been filed against judgment and decree dated 15.12.2011 made in A.S. No. 8 of 2007 on the file of the learned District Judge, Tiruvannamalai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 04.08.2006 made in O.S. No. 174 of 2000 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Arani. 2. The unsuccessful Plaintiff in O.S.No.174 of 2000 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Arani, Thiruvannamalai District, is the Appellant in this Second Appeal. The Appellant, as Plaintiff, had filed the suit in O.S.No.174 of 2000 on the f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
