IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
Ranganathan – Appellant
Versus
Pachaiyappa Nattar (Deceased) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal had been filed against judgment and decree dated 15.12.2011 made in A.S. No. 8 of 2007 on the file of the learned District Judge, Tiruvannamalai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 04.08.2006 made in O.S. No. 174 of 2000 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Arani. 2. The unsuccessful Plaintiff in O.S.No.174 of 2000 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Arani, Thiruvannamalai District, is the Appellant in this Second Appeal. The Appellant, as Plaintiff, had filed the suit in O.S.No.174 of 2000 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Arani, seeking relief of partition and separate possession.
3. The brief averments in the plaint are as follows:-
3.1. The Plaintiff is the eldest son of first Defendant through the fourth Defendant. The fourth Defendant is the mother of the Plaintiff. The first Defendant married the fourth Defendant in the year 1947 according to Hindu rites and caste customs. The first Defendant married one Miana as his first wife. After the death of Miana, the first Defendant married the second Defendant as his second wife. As the first Defendant through the second Defendant had no issues for 12 years, the first Defendant married the fourt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.