SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 74293

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J
V.HEMAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH V.Hemavathi W/o Dhanasekar No 2/77, Mudichur Road, Parvathi Nagar, Old Perungalathur, Chennai 600 063 Petitioner Vs

1. The District Collector Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu 603 001. 2.The District Registrar Office Of The District Registrar, South Chennai, Peranpet, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tambaram Division, Tamabaram, Chennai.

4.The Tahsildar O/o Tambaram Taluk Office, Tamabaram, Chennai.

5.The Sub Registrar Padappai Sub Registration Office, Padappai, Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District

6.The Assistant Director Of Ex-

servicemen Kancheepuram At Tambaram Chennai 600 045 Respondent(s)

Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned order having reference Mu.Tha.Manu.No. 9605283/2024/A1 dated 22.11.2024 on the file of the 4th Respondent, and quash the same and consequently directing the 4th respondent, to carry out changes in the A Register by incorporating the Land Assignment granted in PRO.D.O No.15/79/B2 dated 13.09.1970 in respect of the S.F.No.388/1, Perungalathur Village, Tambaram Taluk Chengalpattu District.

For Petitioner : Mr.E.P.Senniyangiri For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan Special Government Pleader for R2 & R5 Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader for R1, R3 and R4 R6 - Served - No appearance *****

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the fourth respondent dated 22.11.2024 and for a consequential direction to the fourth respondent to carry out the changes in the A-Register by incorporating the land assignment that was granted in the name of the petitioner's father through proceedings dated

13.09.1970.

2. Heard Mr.E.P.Senniyangiri, learned counsel on record for petitioner, Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader for R2 & R5 and Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader for R1, R3 & R4.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the subject property was assigned in the name of the petitioner's father through proceedings dated 13.09.1970 by the Tahsildar, Saidapet. The 'D' form patta was also issued in the name of the petitioner's father on 21.01.1971. Since then, the petitioner's father was in possession and enjoyment of the property and he died in the year 1980. Subsequently, his legalheirs were in possession and enjoyment of the property. The mother of the petitioner executed a Will in favour of the petitioner and other siblings which was registered as Document No.11/1998. The petitioner's mother died on

10.04.2009 and thereby, the Will came into force. The petitioner and other siblings were attempting to sell the property and they entered into a sale agreement which was also registered as Document No.8336/2011. When they applied for mutation of revenue records to include their names in the patta, the said application was not considered and as a result, W.P.No.6899 of 2016 was filed before this Court by the petitioner's sister. The said writ petition was disposed of by an order dated 25.02.2016 directing the concerned authority to pass orders within a period of twelve weeks.

4. Pursuant to the above order, the relevant documents were placed before the concerned authorities and in spite of the same, no action was taken which impelled the petitioner to file W.P.No.30391 of 2023 before this Court. The said writ petition was disposed of by an order dated 28.11.2023.

5. Ultimately, the impugned proceedings dated 22.11.2024 came to be issued by the fourth respondent which has been put to challenge in the present writ petition.

6. The fourth respondent has filed a counter affidavit. The relevant portions in the counter affidavit are extracted hereunder:

7. The only issue that arises for consideration in the present writ petition is as to whether the patta has to be transferred in the name of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top