IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
S.Jayasutha – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Inspector General – Respondent
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.12.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA W.P.Crl.(MD) No.2556 of 2025 S.Jayasutha ... Petitioner -vs-
1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison and Correctional Services Trichy Range, Race Course Road, Trichy-620 023
2. The Superintendent, Central Prison Trichy-620 020
3. The Superintendent of Police O/o. The Superintendent of Police Thanjavur District
4. The Inspector of Police O/o. Thiruvidaimarudur Police Station Thanjavur District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent vide proceedings in No.RO.TRY/351/2025- CA dated 26.08.2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to grant 21 days Ordinary Leave without police escort to the petitioner's brother namely Mahamani, S/o.Mariyappan, Life Convict Prisoner, PID No.35366 confined at Central Prison, Trichy.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.A.S. Prabhu For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.]
The prayer in the petition is to quash the impugned order passed by the first respondent vide proceedings in No.RO.TRY/351/2025-CA, dated 26.08.2025 and direct the first respondent to grant 21 days ordinary leave without police escort to the petitioner's brother namely Mahamani, S/o.Mariyappan, Life Convict Prisoner, PID No.35366 confined at Central Prison, Trichy.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that her brother / convict was convicted by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, by Judgment dated 19.01.2016 in S.C.No.254 of 2014, for the offences under Sections 341 and 302 IPC r/w 34 IPC and he was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. Aggrieved over the judgment, the convict has filed an appeal before this Court in Crl.A(MD).No.362 of 2017 and this Court by an order dated 12.06.2018 acquitted the convict prisoner of all charges. Thereafter, the State had filed an appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Crl.A.Nos.1750, 1751 of 2022 and on 14.10.2022, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India allowed the appeal by confirming the judgment passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur. Her brother is in incarceration for the past four years. Further, the mother of the convict is aged about 65 years and she is suffering from old age ailments, such as, blood pressure, diabetic and hypertention. Therefore, the petitioner being sister of the convict submitted a representation seeking ordinary leave for 21 days for her brother and it was rejected on the ground that on verification it was found that the mother of the convict is not suffering any of the disease as mentioned in the representation and also there will be a threat to the lift of the convict by opponent group and there is a chance for retaliation murder. Further, the convict did not avail any ordinary leave.
3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the convict prisoner was granted leave with escort since there is a life threat to him.
4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
5. On perusal of the materials available on record, we find that the petitioner's mother is suffering from high blood pressure. It is also not in dispute that the petitioner's mother is aged about more than 65 years. The convict is languishing in jail for more than 4 years and as such, he is eligible for ordinary leave for a period of 21 days.
6. In the result, (i) The writ petition is allowed.
(ii) The impugned order dated 26.08.2025, passed by the first respondent, is set aside.
(iii) The convict prisoner, namel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.