IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P. DHANABAL
MUNUSAMY – Appellant
Versus
State by Inspector of Police – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRL OP No.35403 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL
CRL OP No. 35403 of 2025
Munusamy
S/o.Viswanatha Reddy,
Periavattu, Ramapuram, Tada mandal,
Nellore, Andra Pradesh.
Petitioner(s)
Vs
State by,
The Inspector of Police,
C5-Vengal Police station,
Thiruvallur District.
Cr.No.264 of 2025.
Respondent(s)
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. to grant
anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest in Crime No.264 of
2025 pending on the file of the respondent.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Sasikumar
For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udaya Kumar
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
1 / 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/01/2026 04:13:44 pm )
##PAGE2##CRL OP No.35403 of 2025
ORDER
The petitioner/accused, who apprehends arrest in the hands of the
respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) and 326(a)
of B.N.S. in connection with the Crime No.264 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other
accused were found in possession of 8 units of river sand in a lorry bearing
registration No.AP 39 TZ 7071. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a false case
has been foisted against the petitioner and that since the material objects have
been seized, custodial interrogation is not required in this case. He further
submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is
innocent of the offences as alleged. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the
respondent police reiterated the case of the prosecution and submitted that the
sand along with the vehicle has been seized by the respondent police. He would
further submit that there are two previous cases pending against the petitioner
and hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
2 / 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/01/2026 04:13:44 pm )
##PAGE3##CRL OP No.35403 of 2025
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and nature of
offences and also considering the fact that the material objects were seized by
the respondent police and since the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is
not required for the purpose of investigation, I am inclined to grant anticipatory
bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions.
7. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is allowed and the
petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his
appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order
copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thiruvallur, on
condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the
satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left
Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of
their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday
at 10.30 a.m., for a period of 30 days and thereafter as and when required
for interrogation;
3 / 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/01/2026 04:13:44 pm )
##PAGE4##CRL OP No.35403 of 2025
[c] the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to
dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
[d] the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of
the Court;
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned
Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.