Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.DHANABAL, J
Varadharaj – Appellant
Versus
State by The Inspector of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks bail amid allegations connected to assault. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments reference property disputes and claims of innocence. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court assesses nature of offenses and absence of injury. (Para 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. final order for bail granted under specific conditions. (Para 8) |
ORDER
The petitioner/accused, who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 351(3), 49, 118(1) and 126(2) of B.N.S. in connection with the Crime No.265 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 18.11.2025 around 11.30 a.m., when the de facto complainant went to Mariamman Temple, the petitioner, who is the elder brother of the de facto complainant, along with other accused threw chilli powder on his face, tried to assault him and threatened him with dire consequences and hence the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is innocent of the offences and he is no way connected in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner and the de facto complainant are brothers and there was already property dispute between them. Further, he would submit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
