2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 74682
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL
Thanarajan
S/o.Thangappan,
Door No.5/300, Nallampalli Vattam,
Dharmapuri District.
Petitioner(s)
Vs
State Rep. by
The Inspector of Police
Athiyamankottai Police Station,
Dharmapuri District Crime No.368/2025
Respondent(s)
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to grant
anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest in Crime No.368 of
2025 pending on the file of the respondent.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.E.Kannadasan
For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udaya Kumar
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
##PAGE1##
CRL OP No.35630 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL
CRL OP No. 35630 of 2025
Thanarajan
S/o.Thangappan,
Door No.5/300, Nallampalli Vattam,
Dharmapuri District.
Petitioner(s)
Vs
State Rep. by
The Inspector of Police
Athiyamankottai Police Station,
Dharmapuri District
Crime No.368/2025
Respondent(s)
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to grant
anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest in Crime No.368 of
2025 pending on the file of the respondent.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.E.Kannadasan
For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udaya Kumar
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
1 / 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/01/2026 04:13:44 pm )
##PAGE2##CRL OP No.35630 of 2025
ORDER
The petitioner/accused, who apprehends arrest in the hands of the
respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2),
118(2), 318(4) and 351(3) of B.N.S. in connection with the Crime No.368 of
2025, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant is
running an electrical shop near Indian Bank, Nallampalli Village in the first
floor and the petitioner is running water service shop and furniture store in the
ground floor of the same building and they both have acquaintance with each
other; the petitioner used to borrow money from the de facto complainant and
repay the same; in the month of June 2024, the petitioner approached the de
facto complainant and asked him a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- as hand loan for
settling outstanding dues and expansion of his business, but, the de facto
complainant refused by saying that he has no money; after repeated demand
made by the petitioner, the de facto complainant gave a sum of Rs.1,40,000/- as
cash and 5 ½ sovereigns of gold chain to the petitioner for pledging; though the
petitioner promised the de facto complainant that he will repay the amount and
redeem the pledged jewel within two months, he has not done the same; on
07.12.2024 around 3.00 p.m., when the de facto complainant, went to the
petitioner’s shop and asked him to repay the cash and redeem the jewel, the
2 / 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/01/2026 04:13:44 pm )
##PAGE3##CRL OP No.35630 of 2025
petitioner scolded him in filthy language and attacked him using broom stick on
his head and face and made a fist on his chest; the injured de facto complainant
escaped from there and went to the Government Hospital, Dharmapuri, for
taking treatment and hence the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the the
petitioner is an innocent of the offences and he has been falsely implicated in
this case. Hence, the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for
the respondent police would submit that based on the complaint given by the de
facto complainant, the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.368 of
2025 for the offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(2), 318(4) and 351(3)
of B.N.S. and the case is under investigation. He would further submit that the
injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case
pending against the petitioner. However, he strongly opposed to grant
anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
3 / 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/01/2026 04:13:44 pm )
##PAGE4##CRL OP No.35630 of 2025
6. Considering the rival submissions on either side, considering the
nature of offences, considering the fact that there are money transactions
between the petitioner and the de facto complainant, also considering the fact
that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and further considering
the fact that there is no previous case pending against this petitioner, I am
inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following
conditions.
7. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is allowed and the
petit