IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice P. DHANABAL
PECHIYAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
State Rep By – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRL OP No. 35800 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
CRL OP No. 35800 of 2025
Pechiyammal
Petitioner(s)
Vs
State Rep By
The Inspector of Police, Thakkolam
Police Station, Kanchipuram District.
Crime No.347 of 2025
Respondent(s)
PRAYER
To enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.347 of 2025 pending on the file of the
respondent police and thus render justice.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.A. Saranraj
For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government
Advocate (crl.Side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
11.12.2025 for the offences punishable under Section 24(1) of COTPA Act,
2003 and Section 123 of BNS Act, 2023 in Crime No.347 of 2025 on the file of
the respondent police, seeks bail.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/12/2025 03:42:09 pm )
##PAGE2##CRL OP No. 35800 of 2025
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal
possession of 420 packs of Hans Tobacco, each 20 grams, 100 packs of Cool
Lip packs, each 12.6 grams, 55 packs of Swagat Gold Tobacco, each 20 grams
and 300 packs of Vimal Panmasala, each 2.5 grams, totalling to 11.510 Kgs of
banned tobacco products. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the
respondent police have registered a false case against the petitioner and she was
arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.12.2025. According to the
prosecution, the petitioner had illegally possessed 11.510 Kgs of banned
tobacco products. In fact, the petitioner is innocent and she has not committed
any offence as alleged by the prosecution. This case has been foisted against the
petitioner for statistical purpose. Therefore prayed to grant of bail to the
petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that
this case was registered as against the petitioner for the illegal possession of
banned tobacco products, investigation in this case is pending and that the
petitioner has no previous case of similar nature. However, he strongly opposed
to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the nature of offences and also taking note of the fact that
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/12/2025 03:42:09 pm )
##PAGE3##CRL OP No. 35800 of 2025
the petitioner is in judicial custody from 11.12.2025, moreover, the petitioner
has no previous case and also considering the period of incarceration of the
petitioner from 11.12.2025, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner,
subject to the following conditions:
[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released
on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like
sum to the satisfaction of the Learned Judicial Magistrate-
No.II, Arakkonam, and on further conditions that:
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent
police every Saturday for a period of four weeks;
[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to
the offence of which she is accused, or suspected, or of the
commission of which she is suspected;
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during
investigation or trial;
[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such
facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the
evidence;
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/12/2025 03:42:09 pm )
##PAGE4##CRL OP No. 35800 of 2025
learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take
appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law
as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner
released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself
as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs.
State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[g] If the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.