IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice S. SOUNTHAR
Sowndariya – Appellant
Versus
Vijayalakshmi – Respondent
##PAGE1##
C.R.P.No.2154 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.12.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
C.R.P.No.2154 of 2023
and
C.M.P.Nos.13112 and 13114 of 2023
Sowndariya ... Petitioner
vs.
1.Vijayalakshmi
2.Mathan
3.Parameswari ... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, to call for the records of D.V.C.No.09 of 2022 on the
file of the Additional Mahaleer Judicial Magistrate Court, Villupuram and
strike off the same as against the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.K.Saravanan
For R1 : Mr.D.Raghu
For R2 and R3 : Mr.G.Hariharan
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/01/2026 04:37:10 pm )
##PAGE2##C.R.P.No.2154 of 2023
O R D E R
The Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking to strike off the complaint
preferred by the 1st respondent/wife under the provisions of Protection of
Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in D.V.C.No.09 of 2022 on the
file of the Additional Mahaleer Judicial Magistrate Court, Villupuram.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is not a family member of the 2nd respondent/husband and
therefore, there is no domestic relationship between the petitioner and
respondents. In such circumstances, the complaint preferred by the
1st respondent against the petitioner under the provisions of Protection of
Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, is not at all maintainable and
the same is liable to be quashed.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent would submit
that the complaint has been dismissed for default on 08.10.2025. It is also
stated that an application has been filed to restore the same.
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/01/2026 04:37:10 pm )
##PAGE3##C.R.P.No.2154 of 2023
4. If it is the case of the petitioner that she never had any kind of
domestic relationship with the respondents and therefore, the complaint is
not at all maintainable, it is always open to her to raise preliminary issues
before the concerned Judicial Magistrate by filing an application, in case the
complaint is restored.
5. The Full Bench of this Court in the case of Arul Daniel and Others
Versus Suganya reported in (2022) SCC Online Mad 5435 held that any
person aggrieved by the process issued by the Judicial Magistrate can go
before the very same Judicial Magistrate and raise preliminary objections
with regard to the issues like existence of a shared household/domestic
relationship etc. If any order is passed, the aggrieved person can also take
recourse to an appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from
Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The relevant portion reads as follows:-
“87(vii). As there is no issuance of process as
contemplated under Section 204, Cr.P.C. in a proceeding
under the D.V. Act, the principle laid down in Adalat Prasad
v. Rooplal Jindal ((2004) 7 SCC 338) that a process, under
Section 204, Cr.P.C, once issued cannot be reviewed or
recalled, will not apply to a proceeding under the D.V. Act.
Consequently, it would be open to an aggrieved respondent (s)
to approach the Magistrate and raise the issue of
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/01/2026 04:37:10 pm )
##PAGE4##C.R.P.No.2154 of 2023
maintainability and other preliminary issues. Issues like the
existence of a shared household/domestic relationship etc.,
which form the jurisdictional basis for entertaining an
application under Section 12, can be determined as a
preliminary issue, in appropriate cases. Any person aggrieved
by such an order may also take recourse to an appeal under
Section 29 of the D.V. Act for effective redress (See V.K.
Vijayalekshmi Amma v. Bindu V., (2010) 87 AIC 367). This
would stem the deluge of petitions challenging the
maintainability of an application under Section 12 of the D.V.
Act, at the threshold before this Court under Article 227 of the
Constitution.”
6. In view of the categorical pronouncement of law by the Full Bench
of this Court that a person aggrieved by issuance of process can very well
a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.