SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 75034

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN
THASTHAGIR – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18-12-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

CRL RC No. 2418 of 2025 and

Crl.M.P.No.2418 of 2025

1. Thasthagir

S/o.Syed Jalani

2. Syed Jalani

S/o.Bagadhursha

3. Sheerin

W/o. Syed Jalani

4. Shagitha

W/o.Musthaq ali

5. Musthaq ali

S/o.Jakthum Ali

6. Gowsin

D/o.Syed Jalani

7. Rabbani

D/o.Syed Jalani

Petitioner(s)

Vs

State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

Thirukovilur Police Station,

Kallakurichi District. Crime No. 262/2023.

Respondent(s)

PRAYER:Criminal Revision filed under Section 438 r/w 442 BNSS to set aside the order dated 28.08.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No. 542/2024 in S.C.No. 147/2024 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kallakurichi dismissing the petition to discharge the petitioners/accused (A1, A2, A5 and A7) for the alleged offences U/s. 498(A), 304(B) of IPC r/w section 4B(2) of Women Harrasment Act, 2002 and A3, A4 and A6 for an alleged offences Sections 498(A), 304(B)

of IPC by deciding the charges filed against the petitioners/accused are groundless.

For Petitioner(s): V.Kayalvizhi For Respondent(s): Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and she has also made an endorsement in the Court bundle to that effect.

2. In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal revision stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

3.At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the appearance of the petitioners 2 to 7 before the Trial Court is dispensed with except when their appearance is required by the Trial Court for the further progress of the trial, provided, they are represented by any Lawyer. If the petitioners 2 to 7 do not comply with the directions of the learned Judge for appearance, the order passed by this Court will lose its efficacy.

18-12-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No sli To

1.The Inspector of Police Thirukovilur Police Station, Kallakurichi District. Crime No. 262/2023.

2. The Additional Sessions Judge, Kallakurichi.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

sli

18-12-2025

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top