SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 75145

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
M.MURUGESAN – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION – Respondent
W.P.No.48377 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Poushali, M. Lokeshwaran
For the Respondents: U. Baranidharan

A registering officer does not have the legal authority to cancel a registered sale deed; the aggrieved party must approach the jurisdictional civil court for such relief.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to consider a representation and cancel a fraudulent sale deed and unlawfully obtained patta. The petitioner alleged that the sale deed was executed through fraud in favor of a third party. The core issue is whether a registering officer possesses the legal authority to cancel a registered sale deed. The court observed that the registering officer does not have the power to cancel the registered document, and consequently, a writ of mandamus cannot be granted for such a purpose. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Table of Content
1. registering officers lack the statutory power to cancel registered sale deeds; such relief is exclusively within the jurisdiction of civil courts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 21.10.2025 and direct the respondent to cancel the fraudulent sale deed register at Sangagiri Register Office, Document No.2718/2021 dated 22.09.2021.

ORDER

The petitioner asserts that one Chellappa Gounder, Pazhani Gounder and Kuppusamy fraudulently executed a sale deed dated 22.09.2021 in favour of one Rajammal and also obtained a patta unlawfully. After submitting representation dated 21.10.2025 seeking cancellation of such sale deed, the present writ petition has been filed.

2. Learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents 1 to 8, 10 and 11. He submits that the registering officer does not have the power of cancellation.

3. As submitted by learned Special Government Pleader, the registering officer does not have the power to cancel Document No.2718 of 2021. Therefore, a mandamus as requested cannot be granted. It is, however, open to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional civil Court seeking cancellation.

4. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top