IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
J.ESAKKIAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUATION – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.12.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
and
W.M.P.Nos. 54503 & 54506 of 2025
J.Esakkiammal ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Director of School Education,
Directorate of School Education,
DPI Campus, College Road,
Chennai – 600 006.
2.The Regional Accounts Officer (Audit)
School Education Department,
Coimbatore.
3.The Chief Educational Officer,
O/o. The Chief Educational Office,
Salem District, Coimbatore.
4.The Headmaster,
Government Girls Higher Secondary School,
Athur, Salem District – 636 102. ....Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in proceedings having Ref.No.Na.Ka.No.2143/E3/2019 dated 05.10.2019 raising audit objection to the grant of incentive for the M.Phil Degree obtained through distance mode and ordering recovery of the incentive granted to the petitioner from the salary of the petitioner from 18.01.2013 and quash the same as arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to continue to pay the incentive amount to the petitioner for having acquired M.Phil Degree along with petitioner’s salary.
For Petitioner : Ms.K.Chandra For Respondents : Ms.Mythreye Chandru Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the proceedings of the second respondent dated 05.10.2019 raising audit objection to the grant of incentive for the M.Phil Degree obtained through distance mode and ordering recovery of the incentive granted to the petitioner from the salary of the petitioner from 18.01.2013 and quash the same as arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to continue to pay the incentive amount to the petitioner for having acquired M.Phil Degree along with petitioner’s salary.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was appointed as Cluster Resource Teacher Educator in Chennimalai Block, Erode District on 17.07.2006 and is presently working as PG Assistant in Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Athur, Salem. The petitioner completed M.Phil Degree Course in the year 2011 from Annamalai University after obtaining necessary permission from the Planning Controller for which, incentive increment was also sanctioned to the petitioner. However, after a decade, the second respondent has issued the impugned proceedings raising audit objection for grant of incentive to the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner did not obtain permission from the Joint Director of School Education and that the petitioner obtained the higher education through the distance mode and sought recovery of the amount granted to her.
4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that the Headmaster have the power to give permission to the Teachers working in the School for pursuing higher studies. The learned counsel further submitted that the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.2328 of 2018 etc., batch [S.Sivan Vs. The Regional Accounts Officer and others] dated 04.08.2023 has held that the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.91, Higher Education Department, dated 03.04.2009 has only mentioned about the eligibility for a person to get employment and does not deal with anything about allowing of advance incentive increment to the Teachers who acquired higher qualification and prayed for allowing the writ petition.
5.The learned Special Government Pleader fairly submitted that as per the proceedings of the Director of School Education dated 12.04.2001, in Government High/ Higher Secondary Schools, the Headmaster of the School have the power to give permission to the Teachers working in the School for pursuing higher studies. In the present case, the petitioner has obtained permission fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.