SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 75684

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
K.T.VELAVAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent



2025:MHC:2946

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12-12-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

WP No. 39228 of 2025

1. K.T.Velavan

Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector

District Collectorate,

Namakkal District 637001.

2.The Tahsildar

Paramathi Velur Taluk,

Namakkal District.

3.The Revenue Inspector

Pandamangalam,

Namakkal District 637208.

Respondent(s)

PRAYER

To call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned notice dated 30.09.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and quash the same as it is used without jurisdiction by

considering the petitioners reply dated 08.10.2025.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Senthil

For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Selvendran,

Special Government Pleader

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)

Writ on hand has been instituted challenging the show cause notice dated 30.09.2025 issued by 3rd respondent under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Act, 1905.

2. Impugned notice would show that the subject property has been classified as “burial ground”.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is a patta land.

However, the villagers are using the property as a burial ground for long years.

That being so, the impugned notice is to be assailed.

4. Learned Special Government Pleader would submit that encroachments are identified in the burial ground and action for eviction has been initiated.

5. May that as it be, no writ against show cause notice is maintainable, unless such notice has been issued by an incompetent authority having no jurisdiction or tainted with allegation of malafide.

6. Petitioner would submit that a reply has already been submitted in response to the impugned show cause notice. That being so, the authorities competent has to consider the same and issue final notice under Section 6 of the Act. If encroachments are identified, then enforcement actions are to be completed in all respects by evicting the encroachers. Encroachers, if aggrieved against the final notice under Section 6 of the Act, an appeal would also lie under Section 10 of the Act. This being the procedures to be followed, the present writ petition is not maintainable.

7. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedy under the scheme of the Act. No costs.

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.

(S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(C.KUMARAPPAN J.)

12-12-2025 gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To

1.The District Collector District Collectorate, Namakkal District

637001.

2.The Tahsildar Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District.

3.The Revenue Inspector Pandamangalam, Namakkal District

637208.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.

AND C.KUMARAPPAN J.

gd

12-12-2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top