SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 75981

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. ASHA
T.Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
The Government of TamilNadu – Respondent



Teachers promoted after 01.06.1988 as Primary School Headmasters are entitled to both arrears of pay and pension under G.O.Ms.No.207, as settled by binding precedent.

Headnote:(A) Service Law - Pay Fixation - Arrears of Pay - Benefit of G.O.Ms.No.207 dated 30.09.2008 - Counting of service as Secondary Grade Teacher for Selection and Special Grade in promoted post - Entitlement of teachers promoted after 01.06.1988 - Earlier judgments of the High Court have held that such teachers are entitled to both arrears of pay and pension - The impugned orders restricting benefits to pension only are contrary to the settled legal position.

(B) Precedent - Binding effect - Issue decided by a Division Bench - The Court followed the ratio in earlier writ petitions and the Division Bench judgment, holding that the matter is no longer res integra - The respondents cannot refuse arrears of pay on the basis of an internal clarification.

(C) Interpretation of Government Orders - A Government Order directing pay fixation and pension revision necessarily implies entitlement to arrears of pay - The logical consequence is that the employee is entitled to both components. (

Facts of the case:
) The petitioner was appointed as Secondary Grade Assistant Teacher on 01.06.1974, promoted as Elementary School Headmaster on 11.12.1995, and superannuated on 28.02.2008. His pay was revised under G.O.Ms.No.207 dated 30.09.2008, granting Special Grade scale. The Accountant General sanctioned revised pension, but the respondents refused to pay arrears of pay, relying on an internal clarification. The petitioner challenged the orders denying pay arrears. (

Findings of Court:
) The Court observed that the same issue had been decided in earlier writ petitions (e.g., W.P.No.25001 of 2012) and confirmed by a Division Bench, holding that teachers promoted after 01.06.1988 are entitled to counting of Secondary Grade service for Selection and Special Grade in the promoted post, with consequential monetary benefits including arrears of pay. The impugned orders were contrary to the settled law and were quashed. (

Issues:) (i) Whether the petitioner, promoted after 01.06.1988, is entitled to arrears of pay under G.O.Ms.No.207? (ii) Whether the respondents' interpretation restricting benefits to pension alone is valid? (

Ratio Decidendi:) The court relied on the binding precedent that the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.207 includes both pay fixation and pension revision, and thus arrears of pay must be granted. The internal clarification by the Director of Elementary Education dated 23.07.2010 was not in consonance with the Government Order and had been consistently set aside by the High Court. (

Result:) The writ petition is allowed. The impugned orders are quashed. The respondents are directed to grant arrears of pay in respect of pay fixation done under G.O.Ms.No.207 within one month. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • administrative law
    • government orders
      • interpretation of government orders (Para 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 17)
    • public employment
  • practice and procedure
    • writ jurisdiction
      • certiorarified mandamus (Para 18)

Table of Contents

1. Retired Elementary School Headmaster seeks arrears of pay after pay fixation under G.O.Ms.No.207 — entitlement disputed. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 )

2. Petitioner relies on earlier judgments granting arrears; respondents argue G.O. applies only to pension benefits. (Para 11 )

3. Writ petition allowed; impugned orders quashed; respondents directed to grant arrears of pay within one month. (Para 18 )

4. What monetary benefits are covered under G.O.Ms.No.207 for Primary School Headmasters?

The G.O. provides for pay fixation and pension revision; arrears of pay and pension must be granted to eligible teachers. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 )

5. Are Primary School Headmasters promoted after 01.06.1988 entitled to Selection Grade and Special Grade benefits?

Yes, as per G.O.Ms.No.207 and upheld by multiple judgments, the benefit applies irrespective of promotion date if joined before 01.06.1988. (Para 9 , 10 , 14 , 15 , 17 )

6. Is the interpretative proceeding dated 23.07.2010 valid?

No, it was quashed in previous writ petitions as inconsistent with G.O.Ms.No.207; thus cannot restrict benefits. (Para 14 , 17 , 18 )

ORDER

The above writ petition is filed for the following relief :

“ To issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed of the 2nd respondent made in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.2200/C2/2010, dated 23.07.2010 in so far as it denies arrears of pay and the impugned order of the 3rd respondent made in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1884/Aa1/2021, dated 27.12.2021 and quash the same and direct the respondents to grant arrears of pay in respect of pay fixation done under the G.O.Ms.No.207, School Education (G2) Department, dated 30.09.2008 to the petitioner”

2. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Secondary Grade Assistant Teacher on 01.06.1974 . Thereafter, he was promoted as Elementary School Headmaster on 11.12.1995 and had superannuated on 28.02.2008.

3. Before delving into the facts of the case in detail, it may be relevant to refer to the various Government Orders relating to pay fixation, relied upon by the writ petitioner and also the writ petitions filed before this Court challenging the said G.O.s.

4. The Government of Tamil Nadu by G.O.Ms.No.238, School Education (E2) Department, dated 26.06.1998 had directed that the B.T. Assistants working in High School are entitled to count their Selection Grade Secondary Grade Teachers service, for the purpose of pay fixation in the post of B.T. Assistant in Selection and Special Grade Scale of Pay on par with G.O.Ms.No.210 Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Pers) Department, dated 13.03.1987. This G.O.Ms.No.210 provides a concession that if the Selection Grade scale of pay of lower post is identical with the Ordinary Grade scale of pay of the promoted posts, then the services rendered in the Selection Grade scale of pay of the lower post can be counted and pay can be fixed in Selection Grade scale of pay of higher post.

5. After several representations and correspondences with the Department, the Government of Tamil Nadu issued G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 07.08.2000, extending the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.210 dated 13.03.1987 and G.O.Ms.No.238, dated 26.06.1998 to the Elementary School Headmasters in the Elementary Schools. This Government Order was issued with a rider that it would be subject to the result of the writ petitions in W.P.No.8896 of 1994 & etc., batch pending before this Court, inter alia which was filed challenging the G.O.Ms.No.300 dated 07.04.1994. In the aforesaid G.O.Ms.No.300, it was directed that the service in the post of Elementary School Headmaster alone should be taken into account for Selection Grade and Special Grade Pay for Elementary School Headmasters, and this was contrary to G.O.Ms.No.1381 dated 05.10.1990. In G.O.Ms.No.1381 dated 05.10.1990, the Government has directed that the services in Secondary Grade Teachers and Elementary School Headmasters can be taken together for Selection and Special Grade pay in respect of Secondary Grade Teachers who are in the position of Elementary School Headmaster as on 01.06.1988.

6. By an order dated 18.04.2001 in W.P.No.8896 of 1994 etc. batch, this Court had remitted the matter back to the Government for re-fixing the pay of Elementary School Headmasters, by holding that the Government should protect the scale of pay of Elementary School Headmasters.

7. In pursuance to the order of this Court in W.P.No.8896 of 1994 & etc., batch, the Government of Tamil Nadu issued G.O.Ms.No.185 dated 16.12.2002. This G.O.Ms.No.185 was subsequently challenged by the Elementary School Headmasters (who were holding the posts as on 01.06.1988) before this Court in a batch of writ petitions, on the ground that they were denied of the benefits in G.O.Ms.No.1381 dated 05.10.1990. During the pendency of the said writ petitions, the Government of Tamil Nadu issued G.O.Ms.No.160 dated 23.08.2005, inter alia restoring the benefits provided in G.O.Ms.No.1381 dated 05.10.1990 and conferred the same on the Elementary School Headmasters, holding the posts as on 01.06.1988. Consequently, the wri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top