IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
DR .P. PANDIAN – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.12.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Dr.P.Pandian ... Petitioner
Vs.
1 THE UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
NEW DELHI.
2 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (AGRICULTURE),
GOVT. OF UNION TERRITORY OF PUDUCHERRY
PUDUCHERRY.
3 PANDIT JAWAHARLAL NEHRU COLLEGE
OF AGRICULTURE (KARAIKAL ) SOCIETY,
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM
CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
CHIEF SECRETARIAT,
PUDUCHERRY. 4 THE DEAN
PANDIT JAWAHARLAL NEHRU COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE,
SERUMAVILANGAI NEDUNGADU POST
KARAIKAL – 609 603.
5 THE DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS AND TREASURIES
GOVT. OF UNION TERRITORY OF PUDUCHERRY
PUDUCHERRY.
6 THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE GOVT. OF UNION TERRITORY OF PUDUCHERRY PUDUCHERRY.
7 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (ADMN.)
DIRECTORATE OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY PUDUCHERRY. ... Respondents Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of respondents relating to the impugned memorandum of the seventh respondent dated 11.06.2020 bearing Ref.No. No.2092/Ag/ Estt/A3/2020/58/1207, dated 16.11.2020 bearing ref. No.6492/Agri./ Estt./A1/2020/122 and dated 15.07.2022 bearing Ref. No.040/Agri/ Estt/A2/PET/2019/1723 and quash the same and consequently, issue direction to the seventh respondent herein to transfer the lumpsum pension amount of the petitioner to the fourth respondent and further, issue direction to the fourth respondent to make necessary arrangements to receive the lump sum pension amount in the pension fund of the petitioner and to disburse the retiral benefits viz. monthly pension due to the petitioner and all such sums as may be payable to the petitioner with interest at the rate of 18% per annum w.e.f.28.02.2022 till date of disbursement.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Saravanan for M/s.N.U.Pressanna For Respondents : Mr.R.Syed Mustafa Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of respondents relating to the impugned memorandum of the seventh respondent dated 11.06.2020 bearing Ref.No. No.2092/Ag/ Estt/A3/2020/58/1207, dated 16.11.2020 bearing ref. No.6492/Agri./ Estt./A1/2020/122 and dated 15.07.2022 bearing Ref. No.040/Agri/ Estt/A2/PET/2019/1723 and quash the same and consequently, issue direction to the seventh respondent to transfer the lumpsum pension amount of the petitioner to the fourth respondent and further, issue direction to the fourth respondent to make necessary arrangements to receive the lump sum pension amount in the pension fund of the petitioner and to disburse the retiral benefits viz. monthly pension due to the petitioner and all such sums as may be payable to the petitioner with interest at the rate of 18% per annum w.e.f. 28.02.2022 till date of disbursement.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was appointed as Agricultural Officer vide memorandum of the sixth respondent dated 10.05.1983 and by an office order dated 10.06.1983, the petitioner was posted as Agricultural Officer at the Sugarcane Agro Research Farm, Kariamanickam and was thereafter posted in the Directorate of Agriculture in the same capacity. The learned counsel further submitted that after formation of the third respondent society in the year 1987, the petitioner was posted as Assistant Professor on deputation basis w.e.f. 30.09.1991 and thereafter the petitioner was provisionally absorbed in the third respondent Institute on 11.09.1996 and subsequently, the petitioner was absorbed on permanent basis as Assistant Professor with effect from 30.09.1991. The petitioner retired from service on 28.02.2022. Thereafter, the petitioner made representation to the respondents claiming pension, however, his request was rejected.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.