SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 76132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
G.Mathiyalagan – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 28.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

G.Mathiyalagan ... Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Commissioner,

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,

Chennai.

2. The Joint Commissioner,

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,

Mayiladuthurai.

3. The Assistant Commissioner,

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,

Kumbakonam,

Thanjavur District.

4. The Executive Officer,

Arulmigu Somanatha Swami Temple,

Poundarigapuram,

Kumbakonam Taluk,

Thanjavur District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to take appropriate action under Section 79(1) of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 and enforce the eviction orders already passed by the second

respondent under Section 78 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 in respect of temple premises of Arulmigu Somanatha Swamy temple, Poundarigapuram(Enathimangalam), Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District within a time period as fixed by this Court and thereafter secure and restore the temple property by fencing the lands, marking boundaries and ensuring proper administration.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balamurugan For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriya Ananth, Additional Government Pleader for R-1 to R-3.

Mr.VChandrasekar for R-4.

* * *

O R D E R

Heard both sides.

2. The petitioner is a devotee of the fourth respondent temple. The petitioner wants eviction orders earlier passed in respect of the petition-mentioned properties to be enforced. 3. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the fourth respondent states that while they were allowed to enforce the order, they are unable to do so due to pendency of revision petitions filed before the Commissioner, HR&CE Department.

4. The Commissioner, HR&CE Department is directed to dispose of the revision petitions on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eighteen months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the revision petition is dismissed, the eviction orders in question shall be enforced immediately and thereafter, possession shall be resumed. If there is no revision petition is pending as against the eviction orders, the same shall be enforced immediately. This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.

28.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To:

1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chennai.

2. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Mayiladuthurai.

3. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

PMU

28.11.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top