SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 76179

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
M. Thiruvel Azhagan – Appellant
Versus
Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports – Respondent
WP Nos. 4805, 6959, 12256, 12531 of 2022 | 2072, 12821, 13471 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.M. Vijayan, R. Murali, A.K. Sriram, J. Pothiraj, M. Samuel Raja, K. Gowtham Kumar
For the Respondents: R. Subramanian, D. Gopal, N.S. Tanvi, P. Ganesan, K. Subburanga Bharathi, G. Ilangovan, A. Gunaseelan, K.A. Jeya Aakash, L. Chandrakumar, M. Sathyan, Stalin Abimanyu

Sports associations must conduct elections in strict adherence to the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011, and relevant judicial guidelines regarding age and tenure restrictions.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petitions challenge election notifications of sports associations for non-compliance with the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011 (NSDCI). The petitioners sought directions for conducting fair elections in accordance with established judicial guidelines and the NSDCI. (Para 1)

Facts of the case:
Multiple writ petitions were filed by various parties against the election notifications issued by the Amateur Kabaddi Federation of India and the respective State and District Amateur Kabaddi Associations. The core contention was that these bodies failed to adhere to the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011, and violated previous judicial directions regarding tenure and age restrictions.

Findings of Court:
Upon submission by the counsel for the respective associations to conduct elections in accordance with the NSDCI-2011 and the specific directives from earlier High Court rulings, the Court recorded their statements and disposed of the petitions accordingly.

Issues: Whether the sports associations are required to conduct elections in strict compliance with the National Sports Development Code, 2011, and prior court directions concerning age and tenure limits.

Ratio Decidendi: Where parties involved in the litigation consent to abide by the mandatory guidelines of the Sports Code and prior judicial precedents established by competent courts, it is appropriate to dispose of the matter with a strict mandate for compliance.

Result: Petitions disposed of with directions to follow NSDCI-2011 and the Delhi High Court order.

Table of Content
1. mandatory adherence to national sports code for association elections. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

COMMON ORDER

1.These writ petitions have been filed challenging the election notification published by the National Amateur Kabaddi Federation of India, Tamil Nadu Amateur Kabaddi Association and District Amateur Kabaddi Association of Tamil Nadu on the ground that the respective Associations have been violated the National Sports Development code of India-2011 and the orders passed in W.P.No.195/2010 and W.P.no.8915/2011 etc., batch by the Delhi High Court and the Judgment passed in WA.No.1204 of 2022 by this Court and also seeking a direction to the respondents to follow the guidelines imposed by the judgment dated 10.02.2023 passed in WP.(C).No.8915 of 2019 and a batch of writ petitions passed by the Delhi High Court and also in W.A.No.1202/2022 dated 26.04.2022 and the National Sports Development Code, 2011. In the above said judgments, a direction was issued to the respective Sports Association to follow the age and tenure restrictions as formulated by the National Sports Development Council of India-2011 (NSDCI) and the order passed by the Delhi High Court in WP.(C).No.8915/2019.

2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that this Court may direct the respondents to follow the guidelines issued by the NSDCI-2011 and the guidelines framed by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in WP.(C).No.8915/2019 for conducting election.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respective Association submitted that the election will be conducted strictly in terms of NSDCI-2011 and in terms of para 62 of the order in WP.(C).No.8915/2019 by the Delhi High Court. 4. The said statements made by the learned counsel on either side is recorded. Recording the same, all the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respective Association to conduct election strictly in terms of NSDCI-2011 and in terms of para 62 of the order passed in WP. (C).No.8915/2019 by the Delhi High Court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top