SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 76194

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P. DHANABAL
M/s.Lakshmi Sundara Raj – Appellant
Versus
Kalpana Satish and 5 others – Respondent


ORDER

1.This application has been filed by the applicant to implead the proposed party as 6th defendant as necessary party to the suit.

2. The brief facts of the applicant are as follows:-

(i) The applicant is the 1st defendant in the main suit and the plaintiff has filed the suit for partition as against the applicant and others. The main suit itself is not maintainable and the suit is barred by limitation. In fact, the suit properties are self acquired properties of the applicant’s late husband Munisamy Sundararaj and there are no ancestral properties as alleged by the plaintiff in the hands of the husband of the applicant / 1st defendant. The husband of the applicant died on 01.04.1992 and her husband executed a Will in her favour bequeathing all the properties, both movable and immovable properties and the said fact was known to the 1st respondent / plaintiff. The fixed deposit amount, GPF, gratuity, Gold Bonds and Lombard Bank as mentioned in the Schedule I of the will dated 04.12.1980 executed by her husband were all utilised by her for the educational and marriage expenses of her children, viz., 1st respondent / plaintiff herein. The property at No.48, Vinobaji Street, Choolaim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top