SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 76264

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
Prakash – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu Rep. – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

Dated : 27.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

1. Prakash,

2. Pandiyarajan @ Raja,

3. Muthupillai,

4. Lakshmi,

5. Muthurakku @ Rakku, ... Petitioners

Vs.

1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep.,

By, the Inspector of Police,

Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station,

Madurai District..

2. Nagaarjun, ... Respondents

PRAYER :-This petition is filed under 528 BNSS, to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned Charge sheet in C.C.NO.900 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Madurai and

quash the same as illegal in respect of the petitioners.

For Petitioners : M/s.Ferlin Castro.P.F,

For Respondents : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1

: Mr.Surya for R2

ORDER

The petitioners seek to quash the impugned final report filed for the offences under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 115(2), 133 BNS and Section

4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002.

2. The gist of the allegation is that on account of prior enmity, the petitioners had attacked the defacto complainant with hands and abused him in filthy language and thus, committed the aforesaid offences. 3. Admittedly, the petitioners and the second respondent belong to same village and they have now entered into a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 26.11.2025.

4. The petitioner and the defacto complainant are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.N.Muthu, Special Sub Inspector of Police, Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station, Madurai District. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them.

5. Considering the nature of the allegation and the compromise arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned final report pending trial. Accordingly, the impugned final report is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 26.11.2025, shall form part and parcel of the order. The petitioners shall pay a cost of Rs.5,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Authority attached to this Bench and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.

27.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No LS To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Madurai

2.The Inspector of Police, Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station, Madurai District..

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4.The Officer in-charge, High Court Legal Services Authority Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

SUNDER MOHAN,J LS

27.11.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top