IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
Prakash – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu Rep. – Respondent
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 27.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
1. Prakash,
2. Pandiyarajan @ Raja,
3. Muthupillai,
4. Lakshmi,
5. Muthurakku @ Rakku, ... Petitioners
Vs.
1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep.,
By, the Inspector of Police,
Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station,
Madurai District..
2. Nagaarjun, ... Respondents
PRAYER :-This petition is filed under 528 BNSS, to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned Charge sheet in C.C.NO.900 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Madurai and
quash the same as illegal in respect of the petitioners.
For Petitioners : M/s.Ferlin Castro.P.F,
For Respondents : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1
: Mr.Surya for R2
ORDER
The petitioners seek to quash the impugned final report filed for the offences under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 115(2), 133 BNS and Section
4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002.
2. The gist of the allegation is that on account of prior enmity, the petitioners had attacked the defacto complainant with hands and abused him in filthy language and thus, committed the aforesaid offences. 3. Admittedly, the petitioners and the second respondent belong to same village and they have now entered into a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 26.11.2025.
4. The petitioner and the defacto complainant are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.N.Muthu, Special Sub Inspector of Police, Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station, Madurai District. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them.
5. Considering the nature of the allegation and the compromise arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned final report pending trial. Accordingly, the impugned final report is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 26.11.2025, shall form part and parcel of the order. The petitioners shall pay a cost of Rs.5,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Authority attached to this Bench and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.
27.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No LS To
1.The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Madurai
2.The Inspector of Police, Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station, Madurai District..
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4.The Officer in-charge, High Court Legal Services Authority Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
SUNDER MOHAN,J LS
27.11.2025
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.