SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 76265

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P. DHANABAL
T.AMUTHAN ANTHONY (DECEASED) – Appellant
Versus
THE PURASAWALKAM PERMANENT – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1.This appeal has been preferred again the judgment and decree dated 15.12.2014 passed by the fir Appellate Court in A.S.No.161 of 2013 on the file of XV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, wherein, the fir respondent herein has preferred the fir appeal again the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court in O.S.No.3542 of 2007. The said suit in O.S.No.3542 of 2007 was filed by the plaintiffs and the same was decreed. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the fir defendant has preferred the fir appeal. The fir Appellate Court has set aside the judgment passed by the trial Court, by enhancing the decree amount. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiffs have filed the present appeal.

2. The parties are referred to as per their own ranking before the trial Court for the sake of convenience:

3. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

The plaintiffs are the owners of the immovable property bearing Door No.24, Second Avenue, Thirumeni Amman Koil reet, Anna Nagar, Chennai. The plaintiffs had approached the fir defendant for a loan of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Only) on the security of the above property and the 1 defendant after satisfying about the title of the pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top