SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 76415

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
LOGESHWARAN.T – Appellant
Versus
THE UNDER SECRETARY FOR GOVERNMENT OF INDIA – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

and

W.M.P.Nos.48477 & 48479 of 2025

Logeshwaran.T ... Petitioner

Vs

1. The Under Secretary for Government of India,

Staff Selection Commission Ministry of Personnel,

Public Grievances and Pensions Department and

Personnel and Training,

Block No.12, CGO Complex,

Lodhi Road,

New Delhi – 110 003.

2. Regional Director (Southern Region),

Staff Selection Commission,

2nd Floor, EVK Sampath Building,

DPI Campus, College Road,

Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 006.

3. The Directorate General

CRPF (Recruitment Branch)

East Block 07, Level – 4

Sector 01, R.K.Puram, New Delhi – 110 066.

4. Second in Command (IRLA-6065) RANGE: BLR, CRPF Presiding Officer of PET/PST Board, Rectt of CT/GD – 2025 In CAPFS, SSF and Assam Rifles Rectt. Centre: GC, CRPF, Avadi. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, Calling for the records of the 4th respondent dated 25.08.2025 relating to the petitioner Roll No. 8206001637 with recruitment for the post of constable (GD), in CRPF, quash the same as null and void and consequentially directing the 4th respondent to conduct a fresh Physical Efficiency Test (PET) for the petitioner for the post of constable (GD) in CRPF in any date that may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Shunmugarajeswaran For Respondents : Mr.P.Ramprabu ACGSC

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed challenging the rejection slip dated

25.08.2025 issued by the 4th respondent against the petitioner’s Roll No. 8206001637 in the recruitment for the post of Constable (GD) in Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) through the Staff selection commission.

2. Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record.

3. It is seen that some of the persons who had participated in PST/PET of the Central Reserve Force Recruitment 2025, had filed writ petitions before this Court challenging the rejections slips in respect of the same CRPF recruitment 2025. This Court on hearing the submissions of the learned counsel appearing on either side and on perusal of all the relevant records, passed a detailed order in a batch of writ petitions in WP.No33420 of 2025, etc, batch dated 28.10.2025 thereby quashing the rejection slips with certain directions to the respondents. The relevant portion of the aforesaid order is extracted hereunder:

“19. All the petitioners were issued PST/PET rejection slips since they were not qualified in the race and height. After qualifying in the CBE, they were subjected to the PST and PET. Though during the PET, there was no rain, on the previous day, there was heavy rain in Avadi. Therefore, the entire ground was filled with water. After draining the water, the running track was filled with M-sand to conduct the PET. On seeing the videograph produced by the petitioners as well as the respondents, it clearly shows that there was water stagnation on the running track itself.

20. Though the running track was filled with M-sand, there was slipperiness and mud. At a time, if 50 or 100 candidates were directed to run, there will be pushing and pulling of each other, and there will be clashes due to the slippery and wet ground. Therefore, they had to run one by one, and as such, the race was not conducted on a standard ground. As per the guidelines, Clause 6.4(xvii), the respondents must ensure to provide a suitable ground for the race. On seeing the videograph, it reveals that the ground in which the PET was conducted was not suitable for the race, since there was rain due to which there was water stagnation. Therefore, the petitioners who failed to complete the race of 5000 meters within the stipulated time can be given one more opportunity.

21. Insofar as the PST is concerned, on perusal of the records produced by the petitioners, it is revealed that some of the petitioners who had participated in the recruitment for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top