S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Porsche Father in Swap Case
11 Mar 2026
Natural Gas Supplies Prioritized Under Section 3 Essential Commodities Act Amid LNG Disruptions: Central Govt Order
11 Mar 2026
Delhi High Court Directs Ministries, CBFC to Implement Film Accessibility Features for Disabled Persons per RPWD Act Guidelines
11 Mar 2026
Foreign Nationals Entitled to Article 22(1) Grounds of Arrest in Known Language: Karnataka HC Sets at Liberty but Orders Handover to FRRO
11 Mar 2026
Madras HC Permits CBSE Student to Appear for Maths as Additional Subject Despite Policy Violation in Peculiar 'Rat Race' Circumstances
11 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Neha Rathore
11 Mar 2026
Menaka Guruswamy Elected India's First Openly Queer Rajya Sabha MP
11 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
KANIMOZHI – Appellant
Versus
THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.11.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
and W.M.P.Nos.48742, 48744, 48747 and 48749 of 2025
Kanimozhi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.43629 of 2025 S.Sureshkumar … Petitioner in W.P.No.43634 of 2025
-Vs-
1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government,
Home(Police) Department, Fort St.George,
Chennai-600 009.
2. The Director General of Police,
Mylapore, Chennai - 600 009.
3. The Chairman / Director General of Police,
Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board,
Panteon Road, Egmore,
Amendments favoring in-service candidates in seniority over direct recruits violated constitutional equality, necessitating merit-based revisions.
The petitioners were entitled to the benefit of FR 22-B, and the respondent authorities were directed to re-fix the scale of pay of the petitioners by giving them the benefit of FR 22-B.
The court established that supplementary examination marks must be included in seniority calculations for candidates who completed their training within the prescribed period.
The petitioner was entitled to notional seniority on par with the 2008 batch of Sub-Inspectors of Police based on previous orders of the Tribunal and the High Court, as well as a Supreme Court preced....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article