SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 372

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Mrs. Valli – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

Mrs. Valli

Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector,

District Collector Office, Perambalur.

2.the District Revenue Officer,

District Collector Office, Perambalur.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Revenue Divisional Office, Perambalur.

4.The Revenue Tahsildar,

Tahsildar Office, Perambalur.

5.The Deputy Tahsildar,

Taluk Surveyor, Tahsildar, Offfice,

Perambalur.

6.The Village Administrative Officer, Village Administrative Office, North,

Perambalur.

Respondent(s)

PRAYER

Directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 18/09/2025 regarding UDR correction in respect of Survey Nos.333/ 10A, 10A2, 10B1, 10 B2, 10B3, 10B4, 10B5, 10C1, 10C2, 10C3, 10C4, 333 /12, 333/19A1, 19A2, 19B1, 19B2, 19B3, 19C, 333 / 25A, 25B and 25C and to issue patta in My favor based on the title traced from appropriate documents in the

year 1908.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.G. Mani Prabhu For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus seeking for a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.09.2025 seeking for UDR correction for the survey numbers, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition and thereafter issue a fresh patta in favour of the petitioner. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

2.The petitioner claims that she had filed supporting documents along with her representation dated 18.09.2025 seeking for the relief as prayed for in this writ petition.

3.Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner along with her representation dated 18.09.2025.

5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 18.09.2025 seeking for correction of UDR in respect of the survey numbers, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition and thereafter issue patta in favour of the petitioner, if the petitioner is found to be eligible, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner along with her representation dated 18.09.2025, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

07-01-2026 vga To

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Perambalur.

2.the District Revenue Officer, District Collector Office, Perambalur.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Perambalur.

4.The Revenue Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Perambalur.

5.The Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Surveyor, Tahsildar, Offfice, Perambalur.

6.The Village Administrative Officer, Village Administrative Office, North, Perambalur.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.

vga

07-01-2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top