SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 420

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. SURENDER
Siva Subramanian – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED :07.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER

1. Siva Subramanian

2. S.Valarmathi ... Petitioner(s)

Vs.

1. The District Collector,

Pudukottai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Pudukottai District.

3. The Tahsildar,

Ponnamaravathi Taluk,

Pudukottai District.

4. Nallammal ... Respondent(s)

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to cancel patta issued by the third respondent in favour of the fourth respondent, with regard to the property in S.No.653/4B, by

disposing the appeal in Na.Ka.No.A3/3046/2020, pending before him within a reasonable time.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan For Respondent :Mr.P.Subbaraj Spl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3 M/s.Babu Rajendran for R4

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the second respondent to cancel patta issued by the third respondent in favour of the fourth respondent, with regard to the property in S.No.653/4B, by disposing the appeal in Na.Ka.No.A3/3046/2020, pending before him within a reasonable time.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. The petitioners preferred an appeal before the second respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer seeking cancellation of the patta issued to the fourth respondent in respect of the aforesaid properties. The second respondent, in turn, directed the third respondent to submit his report after conducting an inquiry, vide his letter dated 30.07.2020.

However, no action has been taken on the said application. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

4. The learned Special Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3, submitted that the second respondent would conduct an inquiry and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent submitted that the subject matter is pending before the Civil Court in O.S. No. 72 of 2024 on the file of the learned District Munsif-cum-

Judicial Magistrate.

6. In view of the above submissions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to conduct and conclude the inquiry in Na.Ka.No.A3/3046/2020, after taking note of the pending civil litigation, on merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. The second respondent is further directed to afford a reasonable opportunity to the petitioners, the fourth respondent, and all other persons who may be affected by such decision during the course of the inquiry. There shall be no order as to costs.

(K.SURENDER, J)

07.01.2026 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No PKN To

1. The District Collector, Pudukottai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukottai District.

3. The Tahsildar, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

K.SURENDER, J.

PKN

07.01.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top