SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 6874

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
S.Mydheen Pitchai – Appellant
Versus
The District Registrar – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 16.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

and

W.M.P.(MD)No.28574 of 2025

S.Mydeen Pitchai ... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Registrar,

Tenkasi.

2.The Sub Registrar,

Puliyankudi,

Tenkasi District.

3.S.Sahul Hameed 4.Satham Hussain

5.Nagaraj ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to complete enquiry pending in PP/g[spaq;Fo/4/2025 (Receipt No.3773/2025) based on petitioner's representation dated

19.09.2025 on the file of the second respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the second respondent to complete enquiry pending in PP/g[spaq;Fo/4/2025 (Receipt No.3773/2025) based on petitioner's representation dated

19.09.2025 on the file of the second respondent.

2.With the consent of the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3.Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the respondents 3 to 5, notice to the respondents 3 to 5 is hereby dispensed with.

4.Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that in the present case he has filed a protest petition protesting not to register the document presented by the respondents 3 and 4 in favour of the fifth respondent. Since the said petition is pending consideration, he has filed the present Writ Petition.

5.However, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents would submit that due notice will be issued and after hearing the petitioner only, the Sub-

Registrar will take a decision.

6.Considering the submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents, this Court directs the second respondent to conduct enquiry on the protest petition of the petitioner dated 19.09.2025, providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the respondents 3 to 5 as well as any other persons interested in the subject matter, hear them and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three [3] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7.Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

16.12.2025 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No MR To

1.The District Registrar, Tenkasi.

2.The Sub Registrar, Puliyankudi, Tenkasi District.

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

MR

16.12.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top