SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 738

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI
Mr. A.Nilas and 13 others – Appellant
Versus
Mrs. P.Anitha and another – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

1. Mr. A.Nilas and 13 others

No.5, North Street, Singanallur,

Uppilipallayalam, Coimbatore 641015.

2.A.Panneer Selvam,

No. 405, Kiwis Garden, Near

Anthoniyar Church, Karumathampatti,

Coimbatore 641659.

3.Mr.G.Maruthi,

8/88, Near Vinayagar Kovil,

Semmandampalayam, Coimbatore

641659.

4.Mrs.G.Poornima,

1/89, Karadivavi Palladam, Tiruppur

641664.

5.Mrs.K.Kiruthika,

No. 10/1, Kulanthai Velayuthsamy

Street, Velayuthampalaym, Kulanthai

Velayuthasamy Temple Street, Tiruppur

641663.

6. Mr. K.Venkatesh,

2/3, Anantham Nagar, Samalapuram,

Tiruppur 641663. 7.Mrs.M.Sasikala,

4/4A, PKT and Brother, Sulur 641402.

8.Mrs.R.Lina,

19/85, North Street, Ramnagar,

Karugampalayam, Tiruppur 641663.

9.Mr.R.Karthikeyan, No. 128, Teachers Colony, Karumathampatti, Coimbatore 641659.

10.Mrs. V.Vijayalakshmi, 17/9A, Poonthottam, Karumathampatti

641658.

11.Mrs.P.Prema, 12A/57, Thottiyangadu, Somanur, Coimbatore 641668. 12.Mr.P.Thiraviyam, 3/28 1, School Street, Namakkal

637018.

13.Mrs.A.Maheswari, 13/837, Winner City, Karanampettai, Tiruppur 641601.

14.Mrs. C.S.Kalpana, No. 3/256D, SVI Plot, Karanampettai, Tiruppur 641402.

Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. Mrs. P.Anitha and another D/o. K.P.Ponnusamy, No. 5/3A, Kadakaadu Appachi Gounder Street, Kannamapalayam, Sulur, Coimbatore -

641 402.

2.Mr. M.Manimaran, The Special Officer/Principal, Literacy Mission Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Samalapuram, having office as The District Educational Officer (Private School), Nanjappa Municipal Boys Hr.Sec.

School, Tirupur 641601.

Contemnor(s)

PRAYER Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1971 to punish the Respondents for willful disobedience of the Interim Order dated 29.05.2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.M.P.No. 21918 of 2025 in W.P.No. 19549 of 2025.

For Petitioner(s): Mr. V.Anandhamoorthy For Contemnor(s): Mr.P.R.Raman Senior Counsel For Mr.I.Rollence Samuel For R1 Mr.M.Suresh Kumar Aag Asst.By Mrs.Mytheri Chandru Spl.G.P. For R2

ORDER

The petitioners have filed the present contempt petition against the respondents, alleging that they have disobeyed the orders of this Court, dated

29.05.2025 in W.M.P.No. 21918 of 2025 in W.P.No. 19549 of 2025.

2. According to the petitioners, they are still working as teachers;

however, their salaries have not been disbursed due to the objections raised by the first respondent herein, who is the petitioner in in W.P. No.19549 of 2025 and W.P. No.21726 of 2025. Owing to such objections, the petitioners were unable to receive their salaries.

3. On a perusal of the common order passed by this Court in the combined writ petitions, it is evident that this Court granted a stay of the impugned order dated 15.05.2025 issued by the fourth respondent. Consequently, the termination order issued by the fourth respondent stood stayed by this Court. The first respondent has challenged the termination order passed by the second respondent.

4. The learned counsel submitted that, despite the stay order granted by this Court, the bank has not disbursed the salaries to the petitioners, who are still working as teachers in the disputed school. As on date, there is no specific order restraining the disbursement of salary to the petitioners, nor is there any stay order to that effect. Therefore, the bank is directed to disburse the salaries to the petitioners/teachers.

5. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that of now, there are no specific orders with regard to the disbursement of salary. Further, the learned counsel for the petitioners raised an objection stating that the first respondent had given an objection to the bank, due to which the salaries were not disbursed. However, as per the letter issued by the bank dated 12.08.2025, there is no specific allegation against the first respondent. Therefore, the objection alleged to have been raised by the first respondent with regard to the disbursement of salary to the petitioners is not su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top