SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 754

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. BALAJI
ULGAMBAL (DIED) 1.N.RAGHU – Appellant
Versus
Vijayaraj – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Reserved on:05.01.2026 Pronounced on:09.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI

and

CMP. Nos.32280 & 29887 of 2025

Mrs.Ulagambal (Died)

1.N.Raghu

2.Mrs.Ramani

3.Mrs.Rama Petitioner(s)

Vs

1.Vijayaraj

2.N.Ramesh

Respondent(s)

PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the order dated 16.12.2024 in E.A. SR. No.72518 of 2024 in E.P. No.4015 of 2022 in O.S. No.11773 of 2010 on the file of the leaned IX Assistant Judge in the City Civil Court at

Chennai and allow the Civil Revision Petition.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.K.Samy

For Respondents : Mr.V.C.Janardhanan for

Mr.S.Narendra Moorthy for R1

No Appearance for R2

**********

ORDER

The judgement debtors are the revision petitioners, aggrieved by rejection of their application under Section 47 of CPC in EA.SR.No.

72518 in 2024.

2. I have heard Mr.S.K.Samy, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Mr.V.C.Janardhanan for Mr.Narendra Moorthy, learned counsel for the first respondent decree/ holder.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that the first respondent had filed a suit for specific performance and though a decree was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top