IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. ASHA
C. KANAGARAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 05.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
W.P.No. 50317 of 2025
C.Kanagaraj ...petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Office of the District Collector, Chengalpattu District - 603 111.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Tambaram Revenue Division,
Tambaram,
Chennai - 600 045
3. The Tahsildar,
Tambaram Taluk Office,
Tambaram,
Chennai - 600 045
4. M/s. Kasturibai Nagar Islamiya Sunnathval Jamaath, Rep by its Chairman Mr.Yakoop, No.25, VOC Street, Kasturi Bai Nagar, West Tambaram, Chennai - 600045 ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.05.2025 and take proper action within a stipulated time fixed by this Court.
For petitioner : Mr. V.Senthil For Respondents : Mr. D.Gopal
1 to 3 Government Advocate
O R D E R
This writ petition is filed for the following relief:
“To direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.05.2025 and take proper action within a stipulated time fixed by this Court.”
2. The case of the petitioner is that his residential area is composed with people who profess different religion and customary beliefs. The petitioner submits that the 4th respondent has erected a prayer hall specifically for the people who profess Islamic religion in the residential area without getting any proper approval from concerned authorities.
3. It is the further case of the petitioner that on 01.03.2025, the 4th respondent has fixed a name board and also installed a loudspeaker to conduct prayers. The petitioner’s contention is that the 4th respondent has not obtained necessary permission for construction of prayer hall under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Building Rules, 1972.
4. The petitioner submitted that prayer conducted by the 4th respondent is creating nuisance and parking of vehicles on road is creating hindrance to general public. The petitioner submits that the 4th respondent is causing inconvenience to the petitioner and other residents of that area. Therefore, the petitioner submitted his representation to the 1st respondent on 17.03.2024 and the 1st respondent forwarded the same to 2nd and 3rd respondents. On 07.05.2025, the petitioner has made a representation to the 2nd respondent to take action against the 4th respondent. Since there is no response, the petitioner is before this Court.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner’s representation dated 07.05.2025 has been kept pending to date, this writ petition is allowed directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner’s representation dated 07.05.2025, within a period of 1 month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
05.01.2026 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kan To
1. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Chengalpattu District - 603 111.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram Revenue Division, Tambaram, Chennai - 600 045
3. The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk Office, Tambaram, Chennai - 600 045 P.T. ASHA, J kan
05.01.2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.