SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 1087

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
WOMEN ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
THE CHAIRMAN – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.01.2026 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Review Appln. (Writ) No.306 of 2025 and Women Advocates’ Association, Tiruchirappalli, Rep. by its Secretary T.Jayanthi Rani, Having Office at District Court Buildings, District Court Complex, Tiruchirappalli. ...Petitioner Vs.

1.The Chairman, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, High Court Buildings, Chennai – 600 104.

2.The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, High Court Buildings, Chennai – 600 104. ...Respondents PRAYER : This Review Application has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to review the order dated 11.06.2024 passed in W.P.No.3691 of 2020.

For Petitioner : Ms.Ramya Muralikumaran For M/s.Mcgan Law Firm *******

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The Review Application has been instituted to review the order of this Court dated 11.06.2024 passed in W.P.No.3691 of 2020.

2. This Court directed the petitioner Association to submit a representation along with the list of members to the Bar Council to re- consider the earlier decision taken by the Bar Council. The present Review Application is filed only on the ground that the Bar Council is asking the members to submit Certificate of Practice.

3. All the procedural aspects are to be followed by the Bar Council while taking a final decision. If at all any grievance exists during the said period, the petitioner has to approach the Bar Council. That apart, the grounds raised in the present Review Application is falling beyond the realm of the review jurisdiction. Thus, we are not inclined to entertain the Review Application.

4. Consequently, the Review Application is dismissed. No costs.

(S.M.S., J.) (C.K., J.)

19.01.2026 dsa Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No To:

1.The Chairman, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, High Court Buildings, Chennai – 600 104.

2.The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, High Court Buildings, Chennai – 600 104.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

and C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

dsa Review Appln. (Writ) No.306 of 2025

19.01.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top