SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 1101

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
SIVALINGAM – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Sivalingam Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector Dharmapuri Distrct, Dharmapuri

2.The District Revenue officer Dharmapuri Distrct, Dharmapuri 3.The Revenue Divisional officer Dharmapuri Distrct, Dharmapuri

4.The Tahsildar Dharmapuri Distrct, Dharmapuri Respondent(s)

PRAYER Directing the 2nd respondent to grant patta in petitioner name in respect of the property in Survey no 474/1 to an extent of 698 Sq.m situated at Konangi Nayakkanhalli village, Dharmapuri District, by removing the erroneous classification of Grama Natham based on the 4th respondent Recommendation dated 09.02.2024 by considering petitioner representation dated 27.11.2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Selvam For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, Spl.G.P.

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the second respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, by removing the erroneous classification of Grama Natham, based on the fourth respondent’s recommendation dated 09.02.2024, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.The petitioner claims that erroneously, the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, has been classified as Grama Natham land. The petitioner also claims that the fourth respondent through his recommendation dated 09.02.2024 has already recommended for re-classification of the property as patta land. The petitioner has given a representation on 27.11.2025 to the second respondent seeking for re-classification of the property as patta land. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 27.11.2025 seeking for re-classification of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, as patta land instead of Grama Natham land, based on the fourth respondent’s recommendation dated 09.02.2024, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

19-01-2026 vga To

1.The District Collector Dharmapuri Distrct, Dharmapuri

2.The District Revenue officer

3.The Revenue Divisional officer

4.The Tahsildar ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.

vga

19-01-2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top