SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 1836

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice S. SOUNTHAR
M.KALAIVANI – Appellant
Versus
EGNESHWARAN – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

1.M.Kalaivani 2.S.Kalaiselvi

3.V.Sasirekha ... Petitioners vs.

1.Egneshwaran

2.Malathi

3.Keerthi Prasanth

4.Mohanalakshmi 5.S.Lokeshwaran

6.Rajan

7.Sigamani

8.Rejesh 9.Niyaz

10.Naina Mohammed

11.Perumal

12.Raja

13.Jawaharlal ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to dispose of the suit O.S.No.495 of 2023 on the file of the Principal District Judge Court at Chengalpattu within the period as stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioners : Mr.A.Ansar For R1 : Mr.P.Satheesh Kumar For R2 to R4 : Mr.K.Chandrasekaran For R5, R7, R8, R9 and R13 : No Appearance For R6, R10, R11 and R12 : No Such Person

O R D E R

The Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking a direction to the Principal District Judge Court, Chengalpattu to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.495 of

2023, within the time stipulated by this Court.

2. The main relief sought for in the suit is for partition. The suit was of the year 2023.

3. When the matter came up for hearing on 26.11.2025, this Court called for the remarks from the learned Trial Judge. A perusal of the remarks submitted by the learned Trial Judge would indicate there has been no progress in the suit from the year 2023 due to the pendency of four interlocutory applications. Further, it is stated that the suit will be disposed of as expeditiously as possible, within a period of one year.

4. Mr.P.Satheesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the

1st respondent would submit that he filed an application for rejection of the plaint in I.A.No.8 of 2024 and the same is pending as petitioner herein has not filed any counter.

5. Since the petition has been filed to reject the plaint, the same shall be taken up for hearing first and disposed of in accordance with law. 6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as respondents 2 to 4 would submit that they also filed interlocutory applications and the same are pending. The Trial Court is directed to dispose of the other interlocutory applications also and then take up the suit for hearing and dispose it of as expeditiously as possible.

7. With the above directions, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

08.01.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No dm To The Principal District Judge Court, Chengalpattu.

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

dm

08.01.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top