SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 1919

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
P.THIRUNAVUKKARASU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMILNADU – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

1. P.Thirunavukkarasu Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Its Principal Secretary, Land Reforms, Secretariat, Chennai

2.District Collector Kanchipuram District

3.Revenue Divisional Officer(rdo)

Sriperumbudr Taluk, Kancheepuram, District

4.Tahsildhar Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District Respondent(s)

PRAYER Directing the respondents three and four to dispose of petitioner representation dated 13.7.2024 and 4.4.2025 in accordance with law.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Vijayadithan For Mr.S. Pugalanthi For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Govt Advocate For Respondent

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed, seeking for a mandamus to direct the third and fourth respondents to dispose of the petitioner’s representations dated

13.07.2024 and 04.04.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner claims that erroneously a patta has been issued in favour of one Elumalai for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. Hence, the petitioner seeks for cancellation of the same. He has given representations on 13.07.2024 and 04.04.2025 to the third and fourth respondents to cancel the patta issued in favour of Elumalai. Since the said representations have not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed.

3. Mr. C. Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representations dated 13.07.2024 and 04.04.2025, seeking for cancellation of patta issued in favour of one Elumalai are considered on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the objections of the said Elumalai as well as any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the third respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representations dated 13.07.2024 and 04.04.2025, seeking for cancellation of patta issued in favour of one Elumalai for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the objections of the said Elumalai as well as any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.

08-01-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To

1.The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Its Principal Secretary, Land Reforms, Secretariat, Chennai

2.District Collector Kanchipuram District

3.Revenue Divisional Officer(rdo)

Sriperumbudr Taluk, Kancheepuram, District

4.Tahsildhar Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.

ab

08-01-2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top