SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 1934

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice T. VINOD KUMAR
R.Suresh – Appellant
Versus
The Director General of Police and Inspector – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.01.2026 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.No.15154 of 2021 R.Suresh ... Petitioner vs

1. The Director General of Police and Inspector General of Prisons, Chennai – 600 008.

2. The Superintendent, Central Prison – II, Puzhal, Chennai – 600 066. … Respondents Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent in Proceedings No.6660/Po.1/2021 dated 01.07.2021 and quash the same and direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue at the Central Prison – II, Puzhal, Chennai -66.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Jothishankar for Mr.P.Rajendran For Respondents : Mrs.V.Yamunadevi Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and thus, the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top