SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 2377

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice S. SOUNTHAR
Bharanidharan – Appellant
Versus
Kamalam (Died) 1. Radhakrishnan – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Bharanidharan … Petitioner (in CRP.No.6375/2025) Nandakumar … Petitioner (in CRP.No.6377/2025)

vs.

Kamalan (Died) 1.Radhakrishnan

2.Jayaprakash

3.Meena ... Respondents (in both CRPs)

COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kallakurichi in I.A.Nos.122 and 48 of 2025 in O.S.No.78 of 2019, dated 16.07.2025.

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Gunasekar (in both CRPs)

For Respondents : M/s.U.Ramya for M/s.R.Bharath Kumar (in both CRPs)

C O M M O N O R D E R

These Civil Revision Petitions are filed by the petitioners challenging the order passed by the Additional District Judge, Kallakurichi dismissing the applications filed by the petitioners seeking to set aside the exparte order passed against them on 16.12.2019.

2. The respondents herein filed a suit for partition against the petitioners and others. The petitioners, who were arrayed as defendants 3 and 4 in the suit failed to file a written statement and hence, they were set exparte on 16.12.2019. The 1st defendant in the s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top