SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 2420

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
R.SRINIVASAN – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.01.2026 CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA W.P.(Crl.)No.2 of 2026 R.Srinivasan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, DCB Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

3. The Inspector of Police, DCB Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

4. R.Ivarathish ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition (Criminal) is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus or direction in the nature of writ, to direct respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the fourth respondent based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 21.07.2025 and in accordance with law to secure the end of justice.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.D.Ilayaraja For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan

O R D E R

The present Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent Police to take appropriate action on the petitioner’s complaint dated 21.07.2025.

2. Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, takes notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3.

3. In view of the consent expressed by the learned counsel on either side, this Writ Petition (Criminal) is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with inasmuch as no order prejudicial to his interest is passed.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that since the respondent police have not taken any action on the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 21.07.2025 against the fourth respondent, the present petition has been filed. Hence, he sought for a suitable direction.

respondents submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 21.07.2025, an enquiry was conducted in C.No.237/DSP /DCB-II/TVLR/2025 dated 23.08.2025. He further submitted that the third respondent police have completed the enquiry and finding that the dispute between the petitioner and the counter party was civil in nature, closed the complaint on 20.12.2025.

6. Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands closed. No costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the closure report in the manner known to law.

06.01.2026 ham Neutral Citation: Yes/No To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, DCB Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

3. The Inspector of Police, DCB Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

High Court of Madras.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J .

ham

06.01.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top