SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 2422

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
JEEVANA SCHOOL – Appellant
Versus
THE CHAIRMAN – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI W.P.(MD)No.11752 of 2014 AND M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 Jeevana School, Ponmeni, Jeyanagar, Madurai Through its Correspondent Mrs.Lakshmi Iyengar. ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Private School Fees Determination Committee, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

2. The Special Officer, Tamil Nadu Private School Fee Determination Committee, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent passed on 22.04.2013 and the consequent revised order of the first respondent dated 23.01.2014 quash the same and consequently permit the petitioner school to collect the fees as proposed by the petitioner school for the academic year 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 as prayed for in the memorandum of objection of the petitioner dated 21.09.2013.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan For Respondents : Mr.T.M.Amjad Khan, Government Advocate.

* * *

O R D E R

Heard both sides.

2. The writ petitioner is an educational institution imparting education from 10th standard under ICSE sylabus. They challenge the order passed by the Private Schools Fee Determination Committee. Our attention is drawn to the order dated 28.01.2016 pased by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP(C)No.16 of 2013 (Asso. of Management of Pvt. Schools(CBSE) & Anr Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.). The Hon'ble Supreme Court had passed the following order:-

“Leave granted.

In modification and supersession of our interim order dated 15.01.2015, we direct that for I.C.S.E. and C.B.S.E. Schools, the regulatory mechanism of the Fee Committee shall be limited, during the pendency of the present controversy, to the one contemplated under Section 7(3) of the Tamil Nadu Schools (Regulation of Collection of Fees) Act, 2009.”

3. We dispose of this writ petition by holding that the direction given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court will be applicable to the petitioner's school also.

4. It is open to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition based on the final outcome of the case pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

(G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (R.KALAIMATHI, J.)

6th January 2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

AND R.KALAIMATHI, J.

PMU To:

1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Private School Fees Determination Committee, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

2. The Special Officer, Tamil Nadu Private School Fee, Determination Committee, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

W.P.(MD)No.11752 of 2014

06.01.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top