SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 7411

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Victoria Gowri, J
A. Sugnaya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu Rep. – Respondent
Crl.O.P(MD)No.23717 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C. Jeganathan
For the Respondents: S. Ravi

A petitioner must cooperate with a lawful police enquiry; however, the authorities must ensure procedural fairness by issuing written summons and providing prior notice before registering an FIR to allow the party to seek legal remedies.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to the police not to harass her during an enquiry initiated based on a complaint by the third respondent, who claimed to be the wife of the petitioner's husband. The court found that the second respondent had issued summons in accordance with the law. The primary issue was whether the petitioner could be exempted from the enquiry or protected from harassment. The court reasoned that the petitioner is required to cooperate with the lawful inquiry, but to ensure fairness and allay apprehensions, the police must adhere to strict procedural guidelines, including the issuance of written summons and providing notice before registering an FIR. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Table of Content
1. dispute regarding marital status leading to a police enquiry and allegations of harassment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. requirement of the petitioner to cooperate with summons issued in accordance with the law. (Para 4 , 5)
3. procedural safeguards for police enquiries to ensure fairness and prevent arbitrary action. (Para 6)
4. disposal of the petition with specific directions. (Para 7)

PRAYER:

Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry basis on the false complaint given by the 3rd respondent.

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry basis on the false complaint given by the 3rd respondent.

2. Mr.C.Jeganathan, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the third respondent has given a complaint to the second respondent police claiming that she is the wife of the petitioner's husband. In this regard, the second respondent is harassing the petitioner and sought for indulgence of this Court. He further submitted that her husband has suffered a brain stroke and he is bedridden and the petitioner had spent a sum of Rs.80,00,000/- by admitting him in Meenakshi Mission Hospital, Madurai, and still he is under treatment at Coimbatore.

3. Per contra, Mr.S.Ravi, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has lodged a compliant to the first respondent police. In fact the petitioner is the second wife of Ashok Kumar and the third respondent has given a complaint to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ramanathapuram, and the same has been forwarded to the second respondent. In this regard, a summon under section 179(1) and 94 BNSS has been issued to the petitioner in accordance with law. However, the petitioner without appearing for the enquiry has filed this Criminal Original Petition.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side, and carefully perused the materials available on record.

5. On perusal of the records, it is understood that the second respondent has issued summon in accordance with law. The petitioner is directed to appear before the second respondent and co-operate with the inquiry to ally the petitioner.

6. In order to allay the petitioners’ apprehensions and to ensure fairness, the following directions are issued:

(a) With respect to the complaint received against the petitioner, the second respondent-police shall issue written summons/notice under Section 62 BNSS, 2023, specifying the date, time, and purpose of enquiry. Oral or informal summons are prohibited.

(b) The enquiry, if undertaken, shall be completed within two weeks from the date of the petitioners' appearance.

(c) If the police, upon enquiry, conclude that a cognizable offence is made out and propose to register an FIR, the petitioners shall be given prior written notice, enabling them to seek legal remedies including anticipatory bail.

(d) If the dispute is found to be civil in nature, the complaint shall be closed forthwith, without any coercive or intimidatory action.

7. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top