SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 8493

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
Murugan @ Kanna – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

Murugan @ Kanna, ... Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Commissioner of Police,

Office of the Commissioner of Police,

Tirunelveli City.

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police,

Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Police,

Tirunelveli Junction Range,

Tirunelveli.

3. The Inspector of Police,

Thatchanallur Police Station,

Tirunelveli. ... Respondents

PRAYER :- Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to provide adequate protection to the petitioner who is L.W.2 in F.R.No. 116 / 2019 on the file of the Additional District Court No. II for PCR Act Cases, Tirunelveli as provided under Section 15-A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 or the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018, in accordance with law within a

time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani,

For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi,

Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Petition is filed for a mandamus, directing the respondents to provide adequate protection to the petitioner, who is L.W.2 in F.R.No. 116 / 2019 on the file of the Additional District Court No. II for PCR Act Cases, Tirunelveli.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner had not lodged any complaint alleging threat so far; that in fact, the petitioner has now been examined as witness and also been cross examined; and that if there is any specific complaint, the respondents would take action.

3. Admittedly, the petitioner has been examined in chief and cross examined. Hence, the police protection as sought for is not required.

4. Hence, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, if there is any specific threat, it is open to the petitioner to lodge a complaint.

LS/ars TO

1. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City.

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli Junction Range, Tirunelveli.

3. The Inspector of Police, Thatchanallur Police Station, Tirunelveli.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

SUNDER MOHAN,J LS /ars

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top