SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 8749

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
K.LAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 31.10.2025 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN K.Lakshmi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-600 009.

2.THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DPI CAMPUS, COLLEGE ROAD, CHENNAI- 600 006.

3.THE JOINT DIRECTOR (PERSONEL), DPI CAMPUS, COLLEGE ROAD, CHENNAI- 600 006.

4.THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT, THIRUVANNAMALAI.

5.THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICE( SECONDARY), THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT, THIRUVANNAMALAI.

6.THE BLOCK EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, BLOCK EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, PUDUPALAYAM, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. ... Respondents PRAYER:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pass orders on the petitioner’s proposal sent by the 4th respondent, to regularize forthwith his services of the petitioner in the post of Assistant with effect from the date of promotion on 21.09.2015, granting all the applicable increments and pay the difference in pay up to date by considering the petitioner representation dated 14.03.2025 For Petitioner : Mr.P.Murali For Respondents : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru, Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for direction to the 1st respondent to pass orders on the petitioner’s proposal sent by the 4th respondent, to regularize forthwith his services of the petitioner in the post of Assistant with effect from the date of promotion on 21.09.2015, granting all the applicable increments and pay the difference in pay up to date by considering the petitioner representation dated 14.03.2025

2. Heard, the learned counsel appearing on either side.

3. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the writ petition, the first respondent is directed to pass orders on the proposal sent by the fourth respondent seeKing regularisation of the petitioner’s services in the post of Assistant with effect from the date of his promotion dated 21.09.2015 on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

4. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

31.10.2025 Neutral citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

lok To

1.THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-600 009.

2.THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DPI CAMPUS, COLLEGE ROAD, CHENNAI- 600 006.

3.THE JOINT DIRECTOR (PERSONEL), DPI CAMPUS, COLLEGE ROAD, CHENNAI- 600 006.

4.THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT, THIRUVANNAMALAI.

5.THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICE( SECONDARY), THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT, THIRUVANNAMALAI.

6.THE BLOCK EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, BLOCK EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, PUDUPALAYAM, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

31.10.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top