SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 2956

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Lavanya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21/01/2026 CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA W.P.Crl.(MD) No.256 of 2026 Lavanya ... Petitioner -vs-

1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department (Prison), Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai-9.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Trichy Range, Trichy.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Trichy.

4.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District.

5.The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Trichy. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the order passed by the second respondent in No.RO.TRY/508/2025-CA dated 06.10.2025 and quash the same and consequently directing the second and third respondents to grant 28 days ordinary leave without escort to the petitioner's brother namely Satheeshkumar, S/o.Murugesan (P.I.D.o.280707) now confined under Central Prison, Trichy.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.]

Though this writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the second respondent, dated 06.10.2025, thereby rejecting the request made by the petitioner seeking ordinary leave for 28 days for her brother, who is the life convict, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the convict is not entitled for ordinary leave since he has not completed the three years of imprisonment, however he is entitled for emergency leave on the ground that the petitioner as well as the convict lost their parents and there is a huge loan and in order to repay the said loan amount, a property has to be sold out to arrange funds and hence, the presence of the convict the very much essential.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the second respondent seeking Emergency Leave with valid reasons. On receipt of the same, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the representation.

[G.K.I., J.] [R.P., J.]

21/01/2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No am To:

1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department (Prison), Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai-9.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Trichy Range, Trichy.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Trichy.

4.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District.

5.The The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Trichy.

6. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J .

and R. POORNIMA , J .

am

21/01/2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top