IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.12.2025 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Jothivallalar Middle School, Represented by its Manager cum Correspondent, Thiru.K.S.Arumugam, No.1, Vallalar Street, Jothi Nagar, Arakkonam-631 003.

Ranipet District. ... Petitioner Vs

1.The District Educational Officer (Elementary), Elementary Education, Ranipet.

2.The Block Educational Officer-2, The Block Educational Office, Arakkonam, Ranipet District.

3.T.Sundaramoorthy ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1^st respondent made in O.Mu.No.2546/A4/2023 dated Nil.10.2023 and quash the same, consequently direct the 1^st respondent to approve the petitioner’s proposal dated 14.09.2023 submitted to the 1^st respondent.

For Petitioner : M/s.G.Jeremiah For Respondents : Mr.s.Prabhakaran, Government Advocate for RR-1 & 2 : Mr.A.Sasikumar for R-3

O R D E R

Assailing the order passed by the 1st respondent rejecting the proposal submitted by the Petitioner seeking approval of the resolution passed by them accepting the resignation of the 3^rd respondent from the post of Head Master in the petitioner school, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

2. The petitioner herein is an Aided Middle School established in the year 1962 consisting of 211 students from standards I to VIII and eight teaching staffs out of which, there are three Graduate Teachers including the Headmaster and four Secondary Grade Teacher besides one craft Teacher. It is the case of the petitioner that its resolution seeking approval of the resignation of the 3^rd respondent, who had been serving as a Headmaster since 01.10.2015 was rejected by the 1^st respondent through the order impugned in the present Writ Petition on the ground that there is no sanctioned post available for a Science Graduate Teacher and therefore, demotion of the 3^rd respondent from the post of Headmaster to the post of Science Graduate Teacher is not permissible.

Aggrieved by which, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order passed by the 1^st respondent is wholly arbitrary and suffers from non-application of the mind as the 1^st respondent failed to appreciate the fact that, the proposal was only an interchange between the graduate teachers in the petitioner school. He further submitted that, no useful purpose would be served in compelling the 3^rd respondent to continue in the post of Headmaster as he had voluntarily resigned from the post of Headmaster for his own personal reasons having expressed his inability to continue in the said post. Accordingly, he prayed for allowing the Writ Petition.

4. Per Contra, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 & 2 while defending the impugned order submitted that, the claim of the petitioner to downgrade the 3^rd respondent from the post of Headmaster to that of Science Graduate Teacher is not sustainable as there is no such sanctioned post and the only available post is that of English Graduate Teacher. It is further submitted that, if there is any availability of Science Graduate Teacher post in the petitioner school, the proposal for approval would be considered. In the absence of any such post, granting demotion to the 3^rd respondent would be contrary to the provisions of Section 15(1) of the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Rules, 1974. If the petitioner has any grievance, the petitioner ought to have submitted proposal for conversion of the existing graduate teacher post into that of Science as the only graduate post presently available is English.

Accordingly, he prayed for dismissal of the Writ Petition.

5. On the above contentions, this Court heard the learned counsel appearing for the 3^rd respondent who reiterated the averments made in the counter affidavit and submitted that, it is the 3^rd responde