IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable The CHIEF JUSTICE
R.Subramani – Appellant
Versus
Karuppasamy – Respondent
##PAGE1##
WA No.173 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.01.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,
CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
Writ Appeal No.173 of 2026
and CMP Nos.1535 and 1537 of 2026
1. R.Subramani
2. R.Gurusamy
3. R.Manimegalai .. Appellants
-vs-
1. Karuppasamy
2. Rathina Sabapathy
3. The Commissioner
HR & CE Department,
Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034.
4. The Joint Commissioner,
HR & CE Department,
Cotton Market Complex,
Palladam Road, Tiruppur District 641 604.
5. The Assistant Commissioner,
HR & CE Department,
Arulmigu Veeraragava Perumal Kovil Street,
Near Old Bus Stand, Tiruppur District 641 604.
6. The Inspector
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/01/2026 04:16:25 pm )
##PAGE2##WA No.173 of 2026
HR & CE Department,
Palladam, Tiruppur District 641 664.
7. The Fit Person,
Arulmigu Varadharaja Perumal Temple,
Samalapuram Village, Palladam Taluk,
Tiruppur District 641 663. .. Respondents
Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
order dated 19.08.2025 passed in W.P.No.31232 of 2025 on the file of
this Court.
For Appellants : Mr.A.Rajeshkanna
For Respondents : Mr.Sithirai Anandam
for RR 1 and 2
: Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan
Spl. Govt. Pleader
for RR 3 to 7
* * * * *
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was
delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
With the consent of the parties, the case is heard finally at this
stage itself.
2. The sole ground to challenge the legality and validity of the
order passed by the Writ Court is that even though the appellants
were impleaded as parties in the writ petition and the subject matter
Page 2 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/01/2026 04:16:25 pm )
##PAGE3##WA No.173 of 2026
of the writ petition involved property, which was in occupation of the
appellants, they were not given any opportunity of hearing, as no
notices were issued and the order was passed.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents concededly submitted
that the matter may be remanded for hearing afresh.
4. In view of the submission made and that the order impugned
was passed without giving any notice to the appellants or affording
any opportunity of hearing, the order is set aside. The Writ Appeal is
allowed and the Writ Petition is restored to its original number.
There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim
applications stand closed.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.)
29.01.2026
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
sra
Page 3 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/01/2026 04:16:25 pm )
##PAGE4##WA No.173 of 2026
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.
(sra)
To
1. The Commissioner
HR & CE Department,
Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034.
2. The Joint Commissioner,
HR & CE Department, Cotton Market Complex,
Palladam Road, Tiruppur District 641 604.
3. The Assistant Commissioner,
HR & CE Department,
Arulmigu Veeraragava Perumal Kovil Street,
Near Old Bus Stand, Tiruppur District 641 604.
4. The Inspector
HR & CE Department,
Palladam, Tiruppur District 641 664.
WA No.173 of 2026
29.01.2026
Page 4 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/01/2026 04:16:25 pm )
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.