SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 3805

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
K.Indrani – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector General of Registration – Respondent



##PAGE1##

W.P.No.1005 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

W.P.No.1005 of 2026

and

W.M.P. No.1193 of 2026

K.Indrani .. Petitioner

vs

1.The Inspector General of Registration,

Registration Department,

No.100, Santhome High Road,

Raja Annamalaipuram,

Chennai – 600 028.

2.The Sub Registrar,

Gingee Taluk, Gingee – 604 202.

Villupuram District.

3.Lakshmi .. Respondents

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India

praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the first

respondent to take action against the respondents 2 and 3 by

disposing the written representation made by the petitioner on

09.12.2025 within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner : Ms.P.Dhaarani

for Mr.C.Prakasam

For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan,

Special Government Pleader

for R1 and R2

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/01/2026 12:28:23 pm )

##PAGE2##

W.P.No.1005 of 2026

ORDER

By asserting that a settlement deed was executed in respect

of the properties described in paragraph No.2 of the affidavit in

favour of the petitioner’s husband on 22.08.2011, the petitioner

complains of the subsequent registration of a settlement deed by

the third respondent in favour of her husband on 28.10.2025 under

Document No.4726 of 2025. After submitting a representation to

the first respondent to take action against the second and third

respondents in relation thereto, the present writ petition has been

filed.

2. Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader,

accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2. By referring to the

petitioner’s representation dated 09.12.2025, he submits that the

said representation reveals that the petitioner has not approached

this Court bona fide. He points out that there are contradictions in

the said representation.

3. In effect, the petitioner seeks cancellation of Document

No.4726 of 2025 which was allegedly executed by suppressing the

earlier conveyance in favour of the petitioner’s husband. Thus, there

appears to be a title dispute between the petitioner and the third

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/01/2026 12:28:23 pm )

##PAGE3##

W.P.No.1005 of 2026

respondent. The appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to

approach the jurisdictional Civil Court.

4. For reasons aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of by

leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Civil

Court. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

29.01.2026

Index:Yes/No

mmi

To

1.The Inspector General of Registration,

Registration Department,

No.100, Santhome High Road,

Raja Annamalaipuram,

Chennai – 600 028.

2.The Sub Registrar,

Gingee Taluk, Gingee – 604 202.

Villupuram District.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/01/2026 12:28:23 pm )

##PAGE4##

W.P.No.1005 of 2026

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.

mmi

W.P.No.1005 of 2026

29.01.2026

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/01/2026 12:28:23 pm )

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top