SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 3825

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Iyyappan – Appellant
Versus
The Revenue Divisional officer – Respondent



##PAGE1##

WP No. 2189 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29-01-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

WP No. 2189 of 2026

Iyyappan

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Revenue Divisional officer

Kancheepuram District.

2. The Tahsildar

Sriperumbudur Taluk

Kancheepuram District.

3. The Executive Officer

Sriperumbudur Municipality

Kancheepuram District.

4. Lakshimi

..Respondent(s)

Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to

consider petitioner’s representation dated 02.08.2021, 20.12.2022 consequently

direct the respondents 1 and 2 to cancel the patta no.2664 issued in favour of

respondents 3 and 4, issue joint patta in favour of petitioner and his brothers

with respect to old S.No.1461/1B new S.No.1461/1B1 to an extent of 33 cents

in Sriperumbudur Village, Kancheepuram District.

__________

Page1 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/01/2026 07:30:04 pm )

##PAGE2##

WP No. 2189 of 2026

For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.N.Subramani

For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam, GA

For R1 to R3

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents

1 and 2 to consider and dispose of his representation dated 20.12.2022

requesting cancellation of patta granted in favour of the respondents 3 and 4,

within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner seeks for cancellation of patta for the property

morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, which is now standing in

the name of the respondents 3 and 4. For the said purpose, he had submitted a

representation dated 20.12.2022. Since the said representation has not been

considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on

behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed against the

fourth respondent, notice to the fourth respondent in this writ petition is

dispensed with.

__________

Page2 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/01/2026 07:30:04 pm )

##PAGE3##

WP No. 2189 of 2026

7. No prejudice will be caused to the official respondents, if the aforesaid

representation of the petitioner is considered, on merits and in accordance with

law, after hearing objections if any from the respondents 3 and 4 as well as any

other party whom the official respondents deem fit to enquire, within a time

frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by

directing the first respondent to pass final orders on the petitioner’s

representation dated 08.10.2025 seeking for cancellation of patta, which is

presently standing in the name of the respondents 3 and 4, after hearing

objections if any from the respondents 3 and 4 as well as any other party whom

the first respondent deems fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of this order. No Costs.

29-01-2026

Neutral Citation: Yes/No

RKM

To

1. The Revenue Divisional officer

Kancheepuram District.

2. The Tahsildar

Sriperumbudur Taluk

Kancheepuram District.

3. The Executive Officer

Sriperumbudur Municipality

Kancheepuram District.

__________

Page3 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/01/2026 07:30:04 pm )

##PAGE4##

WP No. 2189 of 2026

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

RKM

WP No. 2189 of 2026

29-01-2026

__________

Page4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/01/2026 07:30:04 pm )

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top