IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN
D.ANTHONY MUTHU – Appellant
Versus
R.VAITHIYANATHAN – Respondent
##PAGE1##
Crl.R.C. Nos. 2827 & 2828 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
Crl.R.C. Nos. 2827 & 2828 of 2025
&
Crl.M.P. Nos. 24513 & 24517 of 2025
D.Anthony Muthu
S/o. M. Dasan,
Flat No. 52, 2nd Floor,
Plot No. 52, Poonga Salai,
Thendral Nagar,
Srinivasapuram Extension,
Anakaputhur, Chennai – 600 070. ..Petitioner in both the
revisions
Vs.
R. Vaithiyanathan,
S/o, Ramakrishnan,
Plot No. 113, 6th Cross Street,
Royal Garden,
Kattupakkam, Chennai – 600 056. ..Respondent in both
the revisions.
Prayer: Criminal Revision Petitions filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of
BNSS to call for the records and to set aside the impugned orders dated
1\8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/01/2026 07:30:04 pm )
##PAGE2##Crl.R.C. Nos. 2827 & 2828 of 2025
15.09.2025 made in C.M.P. Nos. 02 & 03 of 2025 respectively in C.A. Nos.
150 & 149 of 2024 respectively on the file of learned II Additional District
and Sessions Judge, Poonamallee and permit the petitioner to give additional
defence evidence to disprove the case of the respondent.
For Petitioner
in both revisions :: Mr.M. Francis Antony
For Respondent
in both revisions :: Mr.R. Darshan
COMMON ORDER
The respective criminal revision petitions challenge the orders
dated 15.09.2025 passed in C.M.P. No. 02 of 2025 in C.A. No. 150 of 2024
and C.M.P. No. 03 of 2025 in C.A. No. 149 of 2024 on the file of learned II
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Poonamallee.
2. The petitioner is an accused in a complaint instituted for
the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. He was
convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to
pay compensation of Rs.40,00,000/- carrying a default sentence of one week
simple imprisonment in respect of S.T.C. No. 55 of 2022 and to undergo
2\8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/01/2026 07:30:04 pm )
##PAGE3##Crl.R.C. Nos. 2827 & 2828 of 2025
simple imprisonment for one year and to pay compensation of Rs.5,00,000/-
carrying a default sentence of one week simple imprisonment in respect of
S.T.C. No. 133 of 2022 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court
at Magisterial Level, Poonamallee. Challenging the said conviction and
sentence, the petitioner preferred appeals in C.A. Nos. 150 & 149 of 2024.
3. During the pendency of the appeals, the petitioner filed
applications under Section 391 Cr.P.C.in C.M.P. Nos. 02 of 2025 and 03 of
2025 in C.A. Nos. 150 & 149 of 2024 respectively seeking to adduce
additional evidence by producing 9 documents.
4. The learned Sessions Judge dismissed the said
applications stating that the petitioner had not appeared before the Court
from 11.01.2023 to 27.06.2024 and the case was adjourned 44 times; that the
petitioner had sought for the very same documents even in his applications
filed under Section 91 Cr.P.C. when the case was pending trial before the
learned Magistrate; that the said petitions were dismissed; that the petitioner
had not challenged the same and that the applications under Section 391
Cr.P.C. have been filed only to delay the proceedings.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that
3\8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/01/2026 07:30:04 pm )
##PAGE4##Crl.R.C. Nos. 2827 & 2828 of 2025
though the applications filed by the petitioner under Section 91 Cr.P.C.
before the Trial Court came to be dismissed and the petitioner had not
challenged the said orders, that by itself, cannot be a ground to reject his
applications under Section 391 Cr.P.C. He would further submit that since
the petitioner is seeking vital documents to prove his innocence and he has a
duty to rebut the statutory presumption, the Appellate Court ought to have
permitted him to adduce additional evidence. Learned counsel for the
petitioner would also submit that though the petitioner sought for 9
documents, he would confine his prayer to 2 documents, namely, (i) the
Loan Repayment Schedule issued by the respondent dated 30.01.2017 and
(ii) the Statement of Accoun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.