IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
G.Krishnaveni – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of corporation – Respondent
##PAGE1##
2026:MHC:352
WP No. 2566 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.01.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
WP No. 2566 of 2026
G.Krishnaveni
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
The Commissioner of Corporation,
Coimbatore Corporation,
Office of the Commissioner of Corporation,
Coimbatore - Post and District.
..Respondent(s)
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuing a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the proceedings made in
S.R.No.58/2025/H1(W) on the file of the respondent dated 23.12.2025 and
quash the same.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Devaraj
For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ferdinand
Standing Counsel
__________
Page1 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/01/2026 04:41:00 pm )
##PAGE2##WP No. 2566 of 2026
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
Under assail is the notice issued by Commissioner, Coimbatore
Corporation under Section 128(2) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act,
1998 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that documents have
been already produced before respondents for consideration. Impugned
notice is nothing but an order passed by Commissioner without providing a
reasonable opportunity. Thus, the order is bad in law.
3. Learned Standing Counsel for Coimbatore Corporation would oppose
by stating that procedures as contemplated under Section 128(2) of the Act
has been complied with. Seven days time is granted to the encroachers to
vacate themselves, failing which Corporation will remove the encroachments
and initiate penal action. Thus, writ petition is devoid of merits.
4. Let us now consider the scope of Section 128 of the Act,
“128. Power to remove encroachment from
public place.—(1) The Commissioner may,—
(a) remove without any notice any movable
temporary structure, enclosure, stall, booth, any
article whatsoever hawked, exposed or displayed for
sale or any other thing whatsoever by way of
encroaching street or public place or the 1[land
__________
Page2 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/01/2026 04:41:00 pm )
##PAGE3##WP No. 2566 of 2026
belonging to or vested with the municipality] with the
municipal limit ;”
Sub-section (2) to Section 128 reads as under,
“(2) Whoever makes any encroachment in any
land or space (not being private property) in any
public street or any 1[ land belonging to or vested
with the municipality] within the municipal limit, shall,
on conviction, be punished with imprisonment which
shall not be less than one year but which may extend
to three years and with fine which may extend to fifty
thousand rupees : Provided that the Court may, for
any adequate or special reasons to be mentioned in
the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for
a term of less than one year.”
5. Therefore, Seven days time is to be granted to the encroachers to
remove encroachments by themselves, failing which, competent authorities of
Corporation is empowered to evict the encroachers without any further notice.
This being the scope of the provision, petitioner cannot plead that there must
be a detailed enquiry and an order to be passed. When the legislature thought
fit and enacted a provision for expeditious removal of encroachments in public
interest, the said provision is to be read as it is. There is no scope for the High
Court to expand the scope of the provision or contemplate any additional
procedure by way of interpretation, which would defeat the very purpose and
objective of such stringent provision enacted by the legislature in public
interest.
__________
Page3 of 7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/01/2026 04:41:00 pm )
##PAGE4##WP No. 2566 of 2026
6. The language employed in the statutes is to be read as it is. Only in
the event of an ambiguity, it may require further interpretation. When Section
128 of the Act is clear in its terms, and seven days time is contemplated
affording opportunity to the encroachers to remove the encroachments by
themselv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.