IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI
Mahalingam – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police – Respondent
##PAGE1##
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1630 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 29.01.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1630 of 2026
Mahalingam ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Madurai District.
2. The State of Tamil Nadu,
Represented by its
The Inspector of Police,
Thirumangalam Taluk Police Station,
Madurai District.
(Crime No.32 of 2016) ... Respondent
PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to direct the
respondents to conduct a fair and proper investigation in Crime No.32 of 2016
dated 25.01.2016 on the file of 2nd respondent and to file the final report
within stipulated time as framed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar
For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar
Government Advocate (Crl.)
1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/02/2026 07:08:54 pm )
##PAGE2##Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1630 of 2026
ORDER
Preface:
The advent of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), and the Bharatiya Sakshya
Adhiniyam, 2023 marks a constitutional transformation in India’s criminal
jurisprudence. For the first time since Independence, the criminal process has
been consciously re-engineered to be victim-centric, citizen-responsive and
justice-oriented, in contrast to the colonial enactments which were historically
designed to subserve the interests of an imperial administration and to control
its subjects.
2. The new Codes emphasise timeliness, transparency, accountability,
and proportionality, recognising delay as a denial of justice. In particular, the
BNSS, 2023, by codifying strict timelines for investigation in Section 193,
ensures that the investigating agency cannot indefinitely keep the sword of
uncertainty hanging over the head of an accused or allow victims to languish
without closure. It is in this mandate of constitutional justice that the present
petition deserves to be examined.
2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/02/2026 07:08:54 pm )
##PAGE3##Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1630 of 2026
3. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 528 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the
respondent police to file a final report with respect to Crime No.32 of 2016.
Submissions:
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the FIR was
registered on 25.01.2016, no final report has been filed till date. Such delay is
contrary to the statutory mandate under Section 193 BNSS, which prescribes
time-bound investigation. It is therefore prayed that necessary directions be
issued.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submits that the
investigation is in progress and the investigating officer shall abide by any
timeline fixed by this Court.
6. Heard the learned counsels on either side and carefully perused the
materials available on record.
Analysis:
7. The BNSS has introduced a strict regime of time-bound investigation,
which reads as follows:
3/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/02/2026 07:08:54 pm )
##PAGE4##Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1630 of 2026
(i) Section 193(1) BNSS mandates that every investigation under this
Sanhita shall be completed without unnecessary delay. (ii) Section 193(2)
BNSS mandates that in relation to offences punishable with imprisonment of
seven years or more, the investigation shall ordinarily be completed within
ninety days; and in all other offences, within sixty days. (iii) Section 193(3)
BNSS, mandates that if the investigation is not completed within the period
prescribed, the investigating officer shall record the reasons in writing and
intimate the Magistrate of such delay.
8. The statute therefore creates (i) a positive duty to complete
investigation promptly; (ii) outer time limits; and (iii) a compulsory
accountability mechanism for delay. These provisions are mandatory in nature
and bind the investigating agency.
9. In the case on hand, it is alleged in the complaint that while the
respondent police were on patrol duty, the petitioner was found in possession
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.