IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Suresh @ Kutty – Appellant
Versus
State Rep by – Respondent
##PAGE1##
Crl.OP.No.2473 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.02.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.OP.No.2473 of 2026
1. Suresh @ Kutty
2. Vignesh @ Bingo
3. Arun Kumar @ Box
4. Saran @ Kalasaran
5. Vignesh @ Tharamani Viki
6. Gokul
7. Arul
8. Dhanush ...Petitioners
Vs.
State rep. by,
The Inspector of Police,
J-2, Adyar Police Station,
Chennai District.
Crime No.83 of 2025. ...Respondent
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023,
seeking to modify the condition imposed by the IX Metropolitan Magistrate
Court, Saidapet, at Para no.3 (b) on the petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.320 of
2026 dated on 20.01.2026, on such terms and conditions.
1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/02/2026 01:39:43 pm )
##PAGE2##Crl.OP.No.2473 of 2026
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Arulselvam
For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh, GA(Crl. Side)
ORDER
This criminal original petition has been filed seeking to modify the
condition imposed by the IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, at
Para no.3 (b) of the order dated 20.01.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.320 of 2026.
2. The brief facts are as follows:-
The petitioners are arrayed as accused in the FIR in Crime No.83 of
2025 registered on the file of the respondent-police for the offence under
Section 103(1) of BNS, which was later altered to Section 103(2) of BNS,
pursuant to the complaint given by one Sumathi and the petitioners were
subsequently arrested and remanded to judicial custody as early as on
15.10.2025. Since the final report was not filed within the prescribed period
and as the petitioners were in judicial custody for about 98 days, they moved
a statutory bail application before the IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court,
Saidapet in Crl.M.P.No.320 of 2026 and the learned Magistrate, vide order
dated 20.01.2026, granted statutory bail to the petitioners on certain
conditions and one among the said conditions is that the petitioners shall
2/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/02/2026 01:39:43 pm )
##PAGE3##Crl.OP.No.2473 of 2026
each execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum
and the two sureties must be local residents and with revenue solvency.
Challenging the same, the petitioners have come up with this petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners
hail from the lower socio-economic stratum of society and they are unable to
get the revenue solvency certificate, due to which, the petitioners and the
sureties could not execute the bonds. He also relied on the decision of this
Court in Crl.M.P.No.3888 of 2017 in Crl.O.P.No.2891 of 2017 dated
24.04.2017 in support of his contention that Solvency Certificate shall not be
insisted upon from the accused or from the sureties. He also submitted that
the petitioners are ready to comply with the other conditions imposed by the
Court below, vide impugned order. Accordingly, he prayed for modification
of the condition imposed by the Court below at Para no.3 (b) of the
impugned order dated 20.01.2026.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the
respondent submitted that the investigation in this case has been completed
and the final report has been filed before the IX Metropolitan Magistrate
3/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 06/02/2026 01:39:43 pm )
##PAGE4##Crl.OP.No.2473 of 2026
Court, Saidapet by way of e-filing. However, he did not dispute the above
submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
5. Heard learned counsel on either side and perused the materials
available on record.
6. The petitioners were arrested on 15.10.2025 and remanded to
judicial custody on the same day. Despite statutory bail granted to the
petitioners on 20.01.2026, the petitioners are unable to come out on bail,
since the Court had imposed the condition directing them to produce two
sureties who are local residents along with revenue solvency. The petitioners
are said to be from the lower economic stratum of the society and they are
unable to arrange revenue solvency.
7.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.